OK, danke für die Korrektur

This is not a service road but residential.
Once again, answer to changeset comments!

The wiki says: „However, unresponsive users who continue questionable edits despite being contacted multiple times first get a warning (so called 0-day block), then progressively longer blocks on their account. „

So please answer to the changeset comments.

1) You make very special and small changes. Because you make edits all over India, you can not have local knowledge of all your edits. Some of your edits seem to be correct. But without local knowledge I would not make these edits.

2) Your changesets say that you use Mapbox sat images: But in all cases ESRI and BING have much better images.

3) Seeing your changesets it seems they are very similiar to the edits of recently blocked users. So is this a new account of another blocked user?

4) it seems, you do not know the meaning of a service roads. Please read the wiki.

4) Are you part of a mapping team?
You can answer here or better: subscribe to the telegram group India and explain the mentioned problems and your mapping intentions.

And you deleted also the boundary of Kakani!!!

You deleted the boundary of Belkotgadhi municipality. Please restore it.

No, the mapping is OK.
Each solar energy area consists of
a) a power plant area (relation 13446097)
b) the solar generators (polygons or multipolygons (here relation 13509122)

AT the moment I can not prove it directly. When I reopening is proved, I will make corrections.

No, it is not an error: You can drive from both sides to the bridge. But only pedestrians can pass the bridge.

The ref-tag and the railway=station is not meant for the building and should be deleted.

The origional way, that you mention, is the station building, It should be tagged with building=train_station. All other railway station in India are mapped with a single node and that makes sense also in this case.

I do not understand the problem.

Your mentioned sources for the NH44 and the NH48 do not define exactly whether the stretch from Bangalore to Krishnagiri is named only NH44 or NH48 or NH44;48.

We have many difficult cases in India (not only in Tamil Nadu). So we need a data source which tells clearly the ref-tag of each NH-way in India. I do not know any. Google can not be used.

If the definition says that NH48 goes from Dehli to Chennai then it makes sense for me, that OSM tells the whole way from the start to the end.

So if you can give me an official data source which tells that each NH way has only one ref-tag, then I agree with you and we should find out the correct values.

Concerning the NH-relations: They should have as members all ways from the NH start to the NH end, even if some ways do not have the NH ref-tag (like NH48 above) and even if some ways are downgraded to primaries (has you have done in TN).

What is the data source that the NH from Hospur to Krishnagiri is NH44 and not NH44;48?

Why did you delete the relation of NH716B?

You made a lot of problematic changes to NHs. Nhs are now interrupted. Please discuss this first with the community (Telegram, forum,talk).

You changed the NH183A. Please explain the reason. It is now against the official notification!

I did not change the road segment in Germany but only had a look. (Strange). The Indian boundary changes was my intention.

As far as I know: there are no border corrections when rivers/streams have changed. So please do not merge boundaries with anything else!

I never use other ways for boundaries but make separate ways. Like this we have less boundary errors!!