Hjart's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
68410806 | over 6 years ago | Hi, could you please avoid messing with osm.org/relation/2689634 ? |
50998410 | over 6 years ago | Uffe, vær opmærksom på at al anvendelse af Google Streetview i forbindelse med arbejde på OSM må anses for at være forbudt (se f.eks. https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/710/can-i-use-google-streetview-to-help-create-maps) |
68376619 | over 6 years ago | Please do not remove wikidata tags like you did on osm.org/way/677850952. They are more important than the wikipedia tags |
68355873 | over 6 years ago | Those turn restrictions sadly do not allow bicycles to enter Slettevang. Replacing them with a little bit of oneway combined with a oneway:bicycle=no as seen in i.e. osm.org/way/1794683 would do the trick, as well as be way more resilient to mishaps (I've seen way too many turn restrictions getting messed up, so I prefer to avoid them when possible) |
68363854 | over 6 years ago | De luftfotos du (i DK) ser i iD (den editor du bruger) stammer fra SDFE og er fra sidste forår.
|
68363854 | over 6 years ago | Stemmer de nuværende forhold her ikke med https://www.bane.dk/-/media/Bane/Borger/Baneprojekter/Ringsted_Femern/Gallerier/Visualiseringer/Rampen-i-Naestved2.jpg ? |
68355873 | over 6 years ago | Wouldn't it be simpler (and better) to make the southernmost bit of Slettevang oneway? |
37574277 | over 6 years ago | Er motor_vehicle=no stadig relevant på osm.org/way/401283786 ? Se osm.org/note/1717358 |
68351311 | over 6 years ago | That should have been covered by motor_vehicle=yes, right? |
68107232 | over 6 years ago | Aalborg is 2 areas too: osm.org/way/665995354 |
68217286 | over 6 years ago | If mondomans comment was rude, your comment sure was too Being somewhat "justified" doesn't make it less so. |
68217286 | over 6 years ago | I think you'll have to be extremely sensitive to find mondomans request rude |
68204573 | over 6 years ago | Du mener om krydset er korrekt lavet? |
68222562 | over 6 years ago | Could you please stick to max 1 country per changeset? This changeset box covers a lot of unrelated countries |
68206781 | over 6 years ago | Please note that this appears to actually be the name of this company: https://www.degulesider.dk/www.gaa-agurk.dk+ivs+valby/125891219/firma |
68107232 | over 6 years ago | As an example, what's in the inner of osm.org/relation/6048794 isn't part of the building. |
68202833 | over 6 years ago | I for example am whatching the activity in Denmark only and this changeset comes up in osmcha there. |
68202833 | over 6 years ago | The changeset box covers a lot of unrelated countries and so causes a lot of mappers to wonder what exactly you did in their area even if you did nothing. |
68107232 | over 6 years ago | The runways etc are part of the military area (Flyvestation Karup), right? If they are, then it will be misleading to exclude them (create an inner) from the multipolygon. |
68202833 | over 6 years ago | Could you please make geographically smaller changesets (max 1 country per changeset)? |