Jeg har rullet din ændring af osm.org/way/526008125 tilbage. Denne vej er efter min vurdering en prober "residential" vej. Jeg har også ændret din "path" til footway da jeg vurderer dette til at være mere akkurat.

Please note that previously only the 2-way cycleways here were mapped as separate ways. the bicycle lanes through the town were and still is tagged as cycleway=lane. This is usually the better solution so I'll probably revert your changes.

Er der virkelig en autocamperplads her? Det ser umiddelbart en smule usandsynligt ud.

Oh, you can actually see tiny arrow heads midway between the nodes on i.e. osm.org/way/42761967

iD was meant to be easy. I guess that's why it's hiding petty details like that ;-)

Oh, and streams too: osm.org/way/89405717

Appears in iD you can only see the direction on oneway roads like osm.org/way/502197323

Every way in OSM has a direction. Not sure why you can't see this in iD (I almost always use JOSM), but the direction of the one I linked to is north.

Do also note that disconnected footways are useless for pedestrian routing.

Yes, of course :-) You're welcome.

Disconnected footways like these always keep flaring up in error reporting tools like https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/ , so we usually end up just removing them.

What I mean by tagging footways on a residential road: osm.org/way/42761965

Do also note that it's usually way better to tag footways on the residential roads than creating separate ways for them.

Please note that footways etc should connect properly to other roads. I've corrected it here.

Please confer with other more experienced mappers in your area before performing more imports. I just ran JOSM's validator over the Stenstorp area. It found 4000+ duplicate nodes (which I have deleted in osm.org/changeset/62131660 ) + a number of buildings within other buildings etc

Hi
I have added building tags, so that these buildings will render on the map

Det ville naturligvis have været en god ide at henvise til vor lille diskussion på osm.org/note/1505889 , så det er hermed gjort :-)

Super :-)

Jeg har lagt Kvickly tilbage på bygningen, da det i praksis er deres. Jeg kender flere andre steder hvor apoteker på tilsvarende vis har lejet sig ind i en Superbrugs eller Kvickly.

Please note that I did not remove the ferry. I just removed it from the multipolygon osm.org/relation/8320226 which it was messing up.