OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
68410806 over 6 years ago

Hi, could you please avoid messing with osm.org/relation/2689634 ?

50998410 over 6 years ago

Uffe, vær opmærksom på at al anvendelse af Google Streetview i forbindelse med arbejde på OSM må anses for at være forbudt (se f.eks. https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/710/can-i-use-google-streetview-to-help-create-maps)

68376619 over 6 years ago

Please do not remove wikidata tags like you did on osm.org/way/677850952. They are more important than the wikipedia tags

68355873 over 6 years ago

Those turn restrictions sadly do not allow bicycles to enter Slettevang. Replacing them with a little bit of oneway combined with a oneway:bicycle=no as seen in i.e. osm.org/way/1794683 would do the trick, as well as be way more resilient to mishaps (I've seen way too many turn restrictions getting messed up, so I prefer to avoid them when possible)

68363854 over 6 years ago

De luftfotos du (i DK) ser i iD (den editor du bruger) stammer fra SDFE og er fra sidste forår.
Jeg ændrede vejene i området for et par dage siden og har simpelthen sjusset mig til ca forløb mm udfra de kilder jeg angav på osm.org/way/593452193
Jeg ruller lige din ændring her tilbage (det kan man bl.a. gøre i JOSM)

68363854 over 6 years ago

Stemmer de nuværende forhold her ikke med https://www.bane.dk/-/media/Bane/Borger/Baneprojekter/Ringsted_Femern/Gallerier/Visualiseringer/Rampen-i-Naestved2.jpg ?

68355873 over 6 years ago

Wouldn't it be simpler (and better) to make the southernmost bit of Slettevang oneway?

37574277 over 6 years ago

Er motor_vehicle=no stadig relevant på osm.org/way/401283786 ? Se osm.org/note/1717358

68351311 over 6 years ago

That should have been covered by motor_vehicle=yes, right?

68107232 over 6 years ago

Aalborg is 2 areas too: osm.org/way/665995354

68217286 over 6 years ago

If mondomans comment was rude, your comment sure was too Being somewhat "justified" doesn't make it less so.

68217286 over 6 years ago

I think you'll have to be extremely sensitive to find mondomans request rude

68204573 over 6 years ago

Du mener om krydset er korrekt lavet?

68222562 over 6 years ago

Could you please stick to max 1 country per changeset? This changeset box covers a lot of unrelated countries

68206781 over 6 years ago

Please note that this appears to actually be the name of this company: https://www.degulesider.dk/www.gaa-agurk.dk+ivs+valby/125891219/firma

68107232 over 6 years ago

As an example, what's in the inner of osm.org/relation/6048794 isn't part of the building.

68202833 over 6 years ago

I for example am whatching the activity in Denmark only and this changeset comes up in osmcha there.

68202833 over 6 years ago

The changeset box covers a lot of unrelated countries and so causes a lot of mappers to wonder what exactly you did in their area even if you did nothing.

68107232 over 6 years ago

The runways etc are part of the military area (Flyvestation Karup), right? If they are, then it will be misleading to exclude them (create an inner) from the multipolygon.

68202833 over 6 years ago

Could you please make geographically smaller changesets (max 1 country per changeset)?