Hjart's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
81963482 | over 5 years ago | Her er tydeligvis ikke tale om gågader, så jeg ruller lige tilbage |
81922956 | over 5 years ago | Please do not touch the imported danish adress nodes |
81877323 | over 5 years ago | Please note that these points are adresses, not doors or entrances and that our bot will eventually move them back to their positions in the official database from where they were imported. |
81832608 | over 5 years ago | Lots of stuff in the wiki needs to be cleaned up. Nothing new there.
|
81832608 | over 5 years ago | It may not be in iD's menu list. That doesn't make it incorrect though. Not being documented in the wiki doesn't necessarily make it incorrect either. Taginfo counts ~1760 examples in the OSM database: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=building%3Dcastle |
81832608 | over 5 years ago | It would have been enough to just add historic=castle. building=castle was never incorrect |
81832608 | over 5 years ago | What makes castle "incorrect"? The building is a castle. |
81732786 | over 5 years ago | Platforms etc are tagged at most stations (see i.e. osm.org/way/248888190). Wouldn't that be enough for showing "where you can get off and on the train"? |
81748164 | over 5 years ago | I have removed this because it was a duplicate of osm.org/way/175208408 |
81732786 | over 5 years ago | 1 is not a practical reason. 2. developers of road routing algoritms appears to do quite fine without messing with OSM data.
|
81732786 | over 5 years ago | Why exactly do you think you need 1 segment per station? |
81732786 | over 5 years ago | Is there any practical reason behind this? |
81727772 | over 5 years ago | Please note that the changeset title is rather misleading and that I've reverted the changeset |
81726653 | over 5 years ago | Any good reason for splitting these? Also please note that I've reverted all of your edits so far. |
81721833 | over 5 years ago | Please note that I've reverted this change, since there was no obvious reason for it |
81627638 | over 5 years ago | Both are valid. Personally I much prefer waterway=river |
81522240 | over 5 years ago | Begræns dig helst til max et land per changeset |
81518996 | over 5 years ago | I have reverted your change to Jylland.
|
81457590 | over 5 years ago | I' ve converted all these image tags to osm.wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons |
81344572 | over 5 years ago | When editing in Denmark please use our national SDFE aerial imagery, which is updated every spring and generally much better aligned than all other options |