Personally, not really. I realise people are trying to reduce the number of giant changesets to make vetting local changesets easier. Not sure if there's any official guidance on that at all.

Somehow they managed to remove a tag (is_in:state_code - OR) from Winchester Post Office

I'm baffled as to how that happens though

Minor off topic, but what are the best validating sites for checking large changsets?

Example: osm.org/changeset/70596736

Overpass is really good for small changesets, but dies on anything above a certain size

You added an extra node for Vertical Endeavors, I'm guessing you meant to add this data to the existing node there for the sports complex?

Why do you include St Mary's Seafood and More in Old St Agustine Plaza instead of Mcdonalds? As far as I can tell from https://www.regencycenters.com/property/detail/134/OldStAugustinePlaza
And
http://maps.coj.net/DuvalProperty/#
it should be the other way around. Is there another source you have I am unaware of?

@ ForstEK
I cheated and looked at Google's street level imagery, there's a zebra crossing with what looks like a lighted sign above it. I assume they meant to tag that, which should probably be tagged crossing=uncontrolled

Added this data back at 360 central avenue as a corporate office osm.org/changeset/70547755

The description says 360 Central Ave. Suite 800 St. Petersburg but this node is 5 streets north of Central Avenue? Plus why have you moved the Clearwater Subdivision boundary?

Why does way #158756819 have the traffic signals tag? It's a building

If you're going for most up to date, Esri tends to be a bit newer than Mapbox in Jacksonville

There's an untagged line in this changest (658963591). What is it? What's it for?

Also changed Switzerland back into a hamlet since that seems to be the convention for unincorporated communities

You missed that there's already a Fruit Cove label, just off Oakvale road

Lots of roads out here tagged as residential despite no sign of houses

Forgot to change the comment of the changeset. Added two businesses here that are moving into currently vacant units

Coleman Road. Forgot to change the changeset description

Has this been scouted out or is it based entirely on aerial imagery? It looks to be like this driveway stops near where it hits the trees and the southern half actually comes from the road coming down from the junction with Gwynford Lane

Also suspect a lot of the service roads in the camp need downgrading to dirt tracks

Checking the St Johns River Water District website suggests this is accurate apart from maybe the deviation across the lake

Also suggests only real Fish Camp Road is the one between 325 and 301

Two extra things to mention here.

Lots of roads around here are labelled Fish Camp Road. That seems weird

There's a weird deviation of the line for Lochloosa Wildlife Conservation area north of the lake. Is this a real feature? I suspect this boundary is inaccurate