OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
82183054 over 5 years ago

This appear in neither of the publicly available Maxar sources, do you have a valid source for this geometry?

82184029 over 5 years ago

Note that the previous classification of this road was done by a local mapper who is likely to have visited the road in question.
Do you have streetlevel imagery not cited in your changeset?

82019388 over 5 years ago

I do not think the staff (west) and public (east) car parks were that interconnected when I last used (one of) them. Note also that no publicly available satellite imagery that I have seen reflects the state post Dorian.

81419232 over 5 years ago

You got an updated street name from aerial imagery?

81087495 over 5 years ago

That's a little awkward, OSM normally prefers either explicit permission or statement of a compatible license if the copyright hadn't expired. Any chance of contacting the author?

81087495 over 5 years ago

What was the copyright notice on the brochure?

80535221 over 5 years ago

Funny how the real estate agents disagree huh?

79818239 over 5 years ago

Do you have a source for this name? Mapbox doesn't normally have this sort of information.

79749232 over 5 years ago

Please try to upload frequently enough that changes are on the same continent.

79660559 over 5 years ago

Changeset comment does not compute.

79582112 over 5 years ago

This deletes the wikidata tag too. Might be a good idea to transfer it to the new relation?

79358497 over 5 years ago

Where was this automated edit discussed?

79160233 over 5 years ago

Is this the name of the beach/bay itself or of a business on the beach?

79095999 over 5 years ago

As the first sentence in the wiki link says they are "... used to encode ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 two-letter country codes ..." and those codes are already in OSM, this seems a redundant addition.

78938545 over 5 years ago

I would think so. The problem isn't that the tag contains a banned word, the problem that the source is one that OSM doesn't have permission to use.
osm.wiki/Copyright#Proprietary_data

78938545 over 5 years ago

If the feature has always been listed as sourced form Google, it should be deleted rather than have its history obscured.

78792633 over 5 years ago

This seems to be an odd conversation on a changeset that didn't change the name of the street.
P.S. the dual carriageway part by the roundabout still has the old name.

77782743 over 5 years ago

CC BY isn't considered compatible with OSM without a waiver so using the linked photo as a source is problematic:
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/

77782743 over 5 years ago

There doesn't seem to be a CC BY Waiver for this source at osm.wiki/Contributors as for other CC BY sources. Do you have a link to one?

77783746 over 5 years ago

Is this the correct end of the cay? There seems to be a prominent shadow towards the western end.