InsertUser's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
132186598 | over 2 years ago | Do you have a source for node 10613335740 being a lift gate? IIRC at least one of the gates is a full sized metal one that either swings or slides. |
131776843 | over 2 years ago | Is this a building or a concrete slab? It doesn't seem to be casting a shadow on the MAXAR imagery. |
131507212 | over 2 years ago | Do you have a user report that this bridge has reopened in the last couple of weeks? It was signed as closed for repair early January. |
122073168 | over 2 years ago | Can the opennng_date and conditional restriction tags be removed now? |
131432809 | over 2 years ago | Cool. I have traced a path down to the beach, marked it as public access and tagged your original point as an information board, so that should hopefully show up as a viable route next time mobile maps are updated. |
131432809 | over 2 years ago | Is this path currently open? |
114000342 | over 2 years ago | I forgot to check onsite, but you can see from the article below that the biggest store in the building does have sprinklers. https://ewnews.com/solomons-lucaya-holds-grand-opening-for-newly-renovated-store |
130909307 | over 2 years ago | Should read addr:substreet |
130960830 | over 2 years ago | There are quite a few bits of abandoned construction around these parts too, but they occasionally find themselves "un-abandoned" and finished when funds become available so it's a bit tricky to figure out what to keep. |
130960830 | over 2 years ago | Hello again. I know in an ideal situation we remove objects from OSM once they no longer exist but please note that many of the buildings made uninhabitable by Dorian are visible as ruins on site and they are also highly visible on some of the aerial imagery. For recently damaged items would you mind leaving the ways in place and prefixing with a lifecycle prefix until such times as the "easily accessible" imagery in iD and JOSM have been updated to reflect the destruction? The database may be cleaner without them, but if they are fully removed they are likely to be re-added from out of date imagery. |
130841919 | over 2 years ago | For a couple of places I have private traces but elsewhere I try to roughly match whatever data is already there. Alignment does change a bit between imagery updates and unfortunately there are already cases where the roads and buildings are done to different alignment so that's not always easy to do. A few areas do have Mapillary imagery so those traces can also be useful for a sanity check. Sorry for such a generic response. I haven't had a broad "ground based" source since Strava became difficult to use. |
130873425 | over 2 years ago | Did you have to edit the whole world all at once? |
74964171 | over 2 years ago | I think this housename might violate the policy against posting personal information. |
130829012 | over 2 years ago | Where was this global mechanical edit discussed? |
130679557 | over 2 years ago | When moving to work on another area please save in between to keep the bounding box small. |
130490788 | over 2 years ago | ASA?
|
130409199 | over 2 years ago | Is this a residential or service road?
|
130425863 | over 2 years ago | I think this should be classified as service.
|
130425878 | over 2 years ago | A little road like this connected to other service roads is unlikely to be "unclassified" in the OpenStreetMap tagging scheme. |
130397826 | over 2 years ago | Are you sure about this? Looks more like a footpath from the width to me. |