What is the actual source for this name change? I doubt it is bing as the changeset claims?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139100976

** bonded

Please don't randomly assign tags for foreign entities just because they happen to look vaguely similar in name or operator.

Deleting the primary tags for the main healthcare facility in a town to satisfy a malfunctioning validator is reckless and borderline vandalism.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131669434

This changeset contains an ATM in a lake, a fishmonger in a river, a pharmacy and bar in an area that looks undeveloped, and a theatre that's only accessible after miles of travel on unpaved tracks.

Are these meant to be tagged as other things? They look very suspicious to me.

1) It's a StreetComplete edit so it's almost certainly surveyed. I think the editor forgot to press upload before getting on a plane.
2) have a look in a proper editor like JOSM, this is two small areas either side of the Pacific.

See also: osm.org/changeset/138152210

What is your source for way 1112536976 as the US embassy?

This does not match their website which continues to correspond to the existing embassy tagged over on Queen Street.

Non-standard is no necessarily bad.

osm.wiki/Any_tags_you_like

This is not the way to handle real paths on private property.

If the paths exist (as they seem to from the satellite view) then they will just be traced again by another mapper.

They should be tagged as having no public access (`access=no`) and then maps that show them can mark them as unusable and apps that use OpenStreetMap data for navigation can adjust the route to avoid them.

More information here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Where was this mechanical edit discussed?

This changeset spans New York, Oklahoma and Florida. Just how big was this tunnel?

This node was in a country outside the normal region of this franchise. Are you sure it was affiliated and that it is now definitely gone?

What basis do you have for the name "Owl's Hole Road"?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137617217

Unless these names are actually signposted they are probably not acceptable for OSM.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137654683

Is the new road to Williams Town passable now?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137611810

There appears to be a conflict between the "name" of "Private Road- Beach Access" and then given it properties indicating that the general public have a legal right of access to this track by foot, bike, horse and vehicle.

Is there actually a legal right to access here or is it "permissive" to people who want to use it?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136908368

Have these buildings really been demolished?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136907770

Satellite imagery of this area suggests that the AiD Building may have been demolished and replaced with something else.

Can you confirm if this is the case?

This appears to have removed the tagging for the type of road from way 55094101. I think this should be corrected.

Is someone reverting this?

Where was this mechanical edit discussed?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136557861