Where was this mechanical edit discussed?

The changeset comment on w345139093 suggests that it was meant to be `oneway=no`

w940974724 has been left completely without tags, which is usually an error. Is there nothing visible on imagery?

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Pease save in between editing in widely spaced areas. Large changesets make it difficult to check for errors.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please upload in between editing in widely separated areas, large changesets tend to notify users who monitor all the towns in between.
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Well, yeah, if you want to spell it correctly. Sheesh, you'd think these things were going to be interpreted by a computer or something...

Thanks.

What is your source for this?
What is the age of your source for this?

A large proportion of the amenities in this area were washed away in Hurricane Dorian, how do you as a remote mapper know that this still exists?

Why are you misusing the main website tag for a random booking website?

Note, fictional element www.osm.org/node/11964831225 (and possibly others) were re-introduced by this edit.

Suggests paired sockpuppets to confound moderation.

RE the FIXME, these aren't mutually exclusive.

Please save in between editing in widely spaced areas. Everyone who monitors their home town between those two locations will end up seeing this edit as something that might affect them.

Hello,
For way 1289115362 you have created a driveway with the name "Driveway". This seems like a description. If it is just a description and not the actual name then the existing `service=driveway` tag is enough to describe it without using the description as a name.

For more information see: osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

An internet search suggests that the website is : https://www.capesantamaria.com/
Does it have any affiliation with the site you have linked?

So when a local mapper stated very clearly that some things were not building you decided to mark them as buildings anyway just because JOSM doesnt like the tagging scheme?

What are you "validating" here?

@SomeoneElse
I've merged the two Dogger Bank features now, keeping the oldest way ID (from this changeset) and the better geometry from the newer import.

These seem like they were almost certainly meant to be `building=house` rather than `home`. Why have you diluted the information to `=yes`?

This changeset marks part of Copt Elm Close (way 758808737) as being a tunnel, imagery suggests this should be a bridge. Was this a mistake or is there something the immagery isn't showing?

oops.

Thanks.

The Zanetti Ice cream shop appears to be a duplicate of one that is already mapped, the restaurant at Beutsee also appears to be quite close to a fast food kiosk that may or may not be the same amenity.

Both of these appear to be more than a month old so your maps might not have updated automatically.

What are you "validating" here? This seems to be arbitrary node deletions.

Has the Cheltenham Hackspace taken over the whole building now? I think they only used to have a single unit.