On what element does this data still exist?

You may want to check more up to date imagery like MAXAR Standard.

Hello,
I see that you have tried to undo much of this edit since making it. I have attempted to undo other parts that looked like they were probably mistakes. Sorry if I have undone anything that was actually intentional.

Connectivity looks OK to me.

Actually adding a building passage, forgot to update the changeset comment.

Hello, have you visited this? The causeway looks like it may have been washed out in a few places in the imagery.

Hello. Have you visited this? The satellite imagery looks like it might be `man_made=quay`.

osm.wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dquay

Please try to provide a changeset comment that's actually informative. Especially when the bounding box covers over half a dozen countries and territories.

The issues are well clarified in OSM guidelines where it says "Do not use data from copyrighted maps or any other proprietary data!" in bold text on the copyright page: osm.wiki/Copyright

This will probably confuse many people.

I think that probably still counts as copying as some of the well known copyright "traps" on maps include fictitious settlements and place names.

1993 is not old enough for the copyright to have expired. This would not be an acceptable source unless you have permission from the authors.

osm.wiki/Copyright

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please save more often, this change has a huge bounding box.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please save more often, I doubt the footpaths actually stretch from Miami to Philadelphia.

Where is this import discussed?

I do not recognise the source "AnyGIS_Sat_clean_HD" has permission been obtained to use it as a source for
OSM?

osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Have you individually verified this mechanical edit?

Do you have a source for these?

Sorry the second paragraph should have read:
Further, given that all the relevant islands are already part of either the relation for The Bahamas or the relation for Turks and Caicos, it would probably make more sense to simply make those relations be a member of a cluster or similar relation.