Source?

(Oops, I wrote both `See' & `Please see' :p)

Please make sure the changeset comment corresponds to the changes made. Thank you.

See: Please see: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

When mapping buildings, try to avoid mapping the shape of the roof as seen from the satellite's camera perspective. Remember, you're trying to map the actual footprint of the building, not just trace the imagery.

Please see this article (in full), and try to follow its guidelines in the future: https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/

Especially this section: https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/#buildings-with-a-ridged-roof , as it speaks about the roof issue I bring up, but in a more clear way.

Also be sure to square the corners of the buildings, as said in the linked article.

When changing an item, please change the item's tags, and don't delete & replace it [1].

In addition, please make sure the changeset comment is relevant to the actual changes [2].

Also please always add a source=* to the changeset. [3]

Thank you.

[1] osm.wiki/Keep_the_history
[2] osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
[3] osm.wiki/Key:source

Please make sure the changeset comment is relevant to the actual changes. Thank you.

As said before ( osm.org/changeset/124933772 ), it is best practice to list a source=*, when uploading a changeset, so that others can know where this information came from.

Please see: osm.wiki/Key:source

Thank you.

As said before ( osm.org/changeset/124933772 ), it is best practice to list a source=*, when uploading a changeset, so that others can know where this information came from.

Please see: osm.wiki/Key:source

Thank you.

No, its not to prove your information correct, it's simply to note the source of it - including `survey' (ie, I saw it). Please read the article I linked.

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

It is best practice to list a source=*, when uploading a changeset, so that others can know where this new information came from.

Please see: osm.wiki/Key:source

Thank you.

Hello, and welcome to OSM, Alex.

It would be best to tag the roads in the parking lot with only highway=service [1], rather than service=driveway ``As of 2021, paths in or around a parking lot (amenity=parking) are tagged with highway=service without service=*'' [2]. See this tag as well: service=parking_aisle [3].

references:
[1] osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice
[2] osm.wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway
[3] osm.wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle

Thank you! ^^

Please make sure your bounding boxes for a single edit are smaller. Thank you.

Please make sure your bounding boxes for a single edit are smaller. Also describe what changed in the logs. Thank you.

Oh yeah don't worry about deleting it or anything. Just try to avoid it in the future. ^^

I should have waited from a reply from you before even considering any kind of undelete - I was unprofessional. My bad.

I apologize that I was incorrect. Please do cite a source & log your changes (on future changesets) so that misunderstandings like this do not happen in future, and others will be able to verify your work using the given sources, or understand that you have special local knowledge if survey was cited. I thought it might have been a mistake, since nothing was mentioned about removing them in the changeset comment.

Please see: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thank you.

reverted in changeset #124554307
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118257295

Why were the baseball pitches removed? They seem to still be on imagery. Will be reverting this changeset if no other comments are made.

undeleted in changeset #124551488

Reverted in changeset #55146607, as no explanation given for the deletion, and they still appear to be on imagery. As per osm.wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway personal driveway are allowed to be mapped.