Why is way 1227013791 not the same way as 639654691 under this location ? In reality this is the same way, except that it should be segregated for foot and bike. Also I believe that before the change of 2 months ago this was not the case

Isn't this domain private? I passed here today and it all seemed very inacessible, with closed gates. But maybe that's just in the weekends ?

I just want to make sure before I start modifying all the roads here to be private

Shouldn't there be a way here to indicate that this pier is in fact accesible ?

In reality you are forced to take the loop to get on top of the bridge, however the way it is currently mapped routeplanners think you can skip the loop. I'm just not sure how I can detach the nodes in a good way to make this happen, can anyone help? Similar on the other side of the bridge

Does anyone know if this whole area is private? I checked the entry on the northeast and northwest and its behind a closed gate saying its private.

Also the roads on the west are als marked as private.

But it looks like it might be accesable from the south? Or is that also not true?

layer=1;2 is not a correct tag for osm.org/way/443636267.

But I'm not sure if I should make this layer=1 or layer=2 instead?

this part is completely overgrown with bushes and fallen trees. Technically possible to crawl in between but I don't think any reasonable person wants to do this.

Can I remove this way or is there any other tag that would be more appropriate ?

I also have pictures but not sure how to add them here.

the path in between here does exist, but its quite a mess with nettles and branches and everything.

This one wasn't too bad to cross, but I'm just wondering if there is a tag to indicate the bad state of the path?

I am very confused about this part of the dender. In reality there is no second split of the river. All of the water goes through the water gates.

Is this part somehow under construction, or is the location just plain wrong ?