JassKurn's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
138947475 | about 2 years ago | Hi Wilpin. Can you let me know what's happened with the Public Footpath here? I visited the village and remapped the footpaths in April this year. At this specific location Public Footpaths had been changed 2 years ago. Lympstone Footpath 3 had been "extinguished" & Lympstone Footpath 1 was rerouted to follow the field edge next to the Brook. ( I assume they'd provided foot access to the historical mill, but that is now private residence) You've edited Footpath 1 to go into the fenced off field. Can't find a change to route or a temporary diversion on Devon CC website. And there there would need to be entrances through the fence. Jass |
138845572 | about 2 years ago | Hi, The name you've changed to is the OSM official_name=* The School was historically based in Exeter and named "Exeter Royal Academy for Deaf Education". It relocated to Exmouth a few years ago rebranded as "the Deaf Academy", but has retained the old name for official databases (eg Ofsted). There was a note added to the School about the lowercase letter. I've changed the name= back to the commonly used name, and added the Official database(?) name under official_name=* I think this is an issue that needs to mentioned in the MapRoulete task. Fairly common for organisations to use a different name for official documentation to that used "on the ground". Notably common with food establishments and FHRS data. |
137130523 | about 2 years ago | Hello, In this changeset you duplicated the toilets. They are already mapped as
As this changeset was only the addition of this toilet, I've removed it using a changeset revert.
|
136912924 | about 2 years ago | Hi, I believe you've made an error in this changeset. You've dragged on node from a road a few 100 metes from where it should be. You can see it on map fairly clearly. |
134731170 | over 2 years ago | Thankyou, fixed in changeset 135261775 |
134698931 | over 2 years ago | Thanks, fixed in changeset 135261775 |
125711591 | over 2 years ago | Just to clarify, it should have been surface=asphalt, and I left out smoothness=intermediate |
125711591 | over 2 years ago | Thankyou. The tag was a mistake. I've fixed the tags in changeset - 135025739 |
134687481 | over 2 years ago | Thanks for the praise. With Exmouth being a "tourist" town, it's normal for things to appear each year. I'll take a look in the next few days. jass |
134687481 | over 2 years ago | Hello, You've mapped a monument in this changeset.
I know the area, and am not aware of any monument. Can you tell me what the monument was? |
134540419 | over 2 years ago | Hi, in this changeset and a few other, you've created an area and added tags "barrier=hedge" and "landuse=farmland". The tag "barrier=hedge" can be used for area, and the way you've tagged is resulting in vast areas being considered hedges. I believe the advise is to map hedges on top of the farmland tag, with breaks for entrances. Jass. |
134087053 | over 2 years ago | Hi, thanks for updating this road. I made some changes to the road and it now has slightly different tagging.
Change from access=no, to access=private. Private is more realistic since the road is used to access properties. Then adding foot=designated there is foot access for everyone, despite the private tag. Made some other changes in area using Public Footpath data from
|
134136268 | over 2 years ago | Hi, I can see two planters on imagery. Which would block car access but allow cycle access, and possibly motorcycle access. I've made changes in following changeset
I've added barrier=planter, and motor_vehicle=no; foot=yes; and bicycle=yes. Can you confirm this was there recently?
The road is still privately owned by the developers, and has not been taken over the council. When the council adopt the road I assume the council would make it official with a traffic order. |
133993957 | over 2 years ago | Thanks, I should have known better |
133752279 | over 2 years ago | Hi quishpapa. You have affectively duplicated tags? The station had the tag proposed:railway=station, and you've added railway=station, plus a couple of other tags that apply it's functioning as a station. The station is still not open so I assume the "proposed" part should still be before several of the tags? |
133489348 | over 2 years ago | I am gradually removing the cycling route relation for the Tour de Manche. The following link to forum explain reasons, and approach. https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/itineraire-velo-tour-de-manche/13154 |
133489054 | over 2 years ago | I am gradually removing the cycling route relation for the Tour de Manche. The following link to forum explain reasons, and approach. https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/itineraire-velo-tour-de-manche/13154 |
133489011 | over 2 years ago | I am gradually removing the cycling route relation for the Tour de Manche. The following link to forum explain reasons, and approach. https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/itineraire-velo-tour-de-manche/13154 |
133488809 | over 2 years ago | I am gradually removing the cycling route relation for the Tour de Manche. The following link to forum explain reasons, and approach. https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/itineraire-velo-tour-de-manche/13154 |
133488214 | over 2 years ago | I am gradually removing the cycling route relation for the Tour de Manche. The following link to forum explain reasons, and approach. https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/itineraire-velo-tour-de-manche/13154 |