OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
97598234 over 4 years ago

thanks for spotting that the road was too long...I turned it into a private driveway otherwise Amazon won't be able to find you... BTW you might want to add the address to osm.org/way/867672424

10112250 over 4 years ago

Heh, sorry, didn't notice it was 9 years ago. Similar thoughts here. Defining a property boundary as a relation of walls, fences, driveways, etc. whilst correct, is clumsy...but UK property definitions are clumsy. It may come up for discussion again due to ref:UK:uprn. Thanks for the response.

10112250 over 4 years ago

I'm interested in the use of property_boundary. Should it not be something tangible like a wall or a fence? Or are you intending to upgrade them later? Or do you mean that it's an observable boundary like 2 joined driveways?

53338304 over 4 years ago

A long time ago, I know, but just been reading https://memoirsofametrogirl.com/2018/12/29/sloane-square-tube-station-river-westbourne-kilburn-history/ is this actually a culvert and not an aquaduct?

95937422 over 4 years ago

Ach, sorry, that is just further down. This is a driveway osm.org/changeset/95949338

95527880 over 4 years ago

Updated in osm.org/changeset/95948200

95527880 over 4 years ago

It's the footpath/sidewalk

95937422 over 4 years ago

Oh really?! I'd like to see you drive a car up that. It's a footpath.

93483344 over 4 years ago

ha! I claim the extenuating circumstances of it being a cold November dog walk, and me typing into Vespucci with cold, fat fingers whilst said dog pulls on the lead making the phone move. :D

94155880 over 4 years ago

I've marked it as 'removed' on https://osm.mathmos.net/postboxes/progress/BN/BN3/#13/50.8363/-0.1873
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94155880

94461347 over 4 years ago

thanks...but, it was my fault that a relation got created because I was trying to do building-parts in iD and failed. I've since re-edited this to make it a house again.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94461347

94461347 over 4 years ago

thanks...but, it was my fault that a relation got created because I was trying to do building-parts in iD and failed. I've since re-edited this to make it a house again.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94461347

94502073 over 4 years ago

Whilst I accept that having an ex-railway line on the map has value, as it may become the route of a cyclepath/footway/etc. the addition of the ex-sidings is highly questionable. It really does belong on OpenHistoricalMap and not on current OSM.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94502073

90968241 over 4 years ago

Hi James,

I was creating the ref:GB:uprn wiki page and discovered a chain through the taginfo....go to the values, choose one, then find the Overpass Turbo link and it find the OSM object!

Kind regards,
Jez

90968241 over 4 years ago

Are you that the street should have a UPRN? 'p' as in 'property'....USRN, yes.

93126963 almost 5 years ago

Thank you

92367593 almost 5 years ago

Hi Rachel, does this mean that they are over next to (above?) the Al Campo Lounge on London Road now? If so I will shift this point over to there.
Regards,
Jez

89984122 almost 5 years ago

oh yes, thank you, got it! osm.org/changeset/90063511

88259279 almost 5 years ago

no worries. I've added the repd:id and power rating back to the grass relation. Solar Farm tagging is an evolving art :)

88259279 almost 5 years ago

Hi, Please take care to retain attributes such as the repd:id if you delete and replace an object. There are systems that use these values to extract data from OSM.
Regards, Jez