OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
152908585 about 1 year ago

And (due to the underground garagae) way 27778351 has a maximum load rating of, erm, 2.5 t (see sign next to node 305008387).

152908585 about 1 year ago

Amendment: Attached to a wall there is a sign „Platz der Begegnung“ in the inner court yard. It is not a street sign proper, but maybe we’ll maybe map it nonetheless.

152908585 about 1 year ago

Thank you for resolving this and many other notes of mine!

47177001 about 1 year ago

Seconded, railway=disused is indeed inappropriate.

Maybe we can call it an art installation or monument instead?

Currently this feature is flagged as “Line has not descriptive tags.” It is just a warning, but still.

149465646 about 1 year ago

Is there a source on the ground confirming this new name?

143026820 about 1 year ago

This appears to be a duplicate of node 1098621675.

Did you mean to _move_ node 1098621675 to the position of the newly created node 11283977670?

113625970 over 1 year ago

Did you mean to connect nodes 9241598605, 9241598608, 9241598606 and 9241598607 with edges to form the outline of a building?

71420435 over 1 year ago

Your waterfall is not connected to any waterways. Is this a mistake?

73338434 almost 2 years ago

There’s an issue with way 713616005. On OSM `area` is not used to indicate the surface area. (You can calculate it from the polygon anyway.)

29814508 almost 2 years ago

Is the change on polygon 4741068 appropriate? The building 237010759 is already tagged as amenity=kindergarten.

According to the wiki one area comprising all kindergarten facilities should be tagged as amenity=kindergarten.

139001745 about 2 years ago

I’m pretty sure 11067450206 is on the greenstrip _between_ the road and sidewalk.

10706369 over 2 years ago

The Periodista Evaristo Cantero (way 150691457) has a “disconnected from the rest of the network” issue. Could you add the missing link?

From the looks of it, maybe area=yes is missing, too?

128331290 over 2 years ago

Thank you for edit. There is already way 783705460 → osm.org/way/783705460 that documents this building. I have deleted your building now, see changeset 135512876 → osm.org/changeset/135512876

132489612 over 2 years ago

Changeset comment has been truncated. This is the second URL: https://www.Northeim.de/startseite-details/aktuelle-situation-und-zukunft-der-bruecken-am-brunkelskamp.html

82590101 over 2 years ago

Du brauchst mich nicht zu fragen. Die Änderungen klingen plausibel.

126557818 almost 3 years ago

This change is wrong:
• On the bridge only the pedestrian part is open. Bicycles cannot pass.
• Ways 21361666 (eastern part), 194832680, 1090340620 are still completely blocked.

42244705 almost 3 years ago

Danke für die Rückmeldung. Ich habe den Knotenpunkt entfernt (Changeset #124511724).

42244705 almost 3 years ago

This needs clarification.

88367459 over 4 years ago

Confirmed: Turn restriction has been lifted. Thank you for pointing that out.

61544888 almost 7 years ago

lol, “Baufortschritte” mit hashtag allesKaputt