Kays's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
152908585 | about 1 year ago | And (due to the underground garagae) way 27778351 has a maximum load rating of, erm, 2.5 t (see sign next to node 305008387). |
152908585 | about 1 year ago | Amendment: Attached to a wall there is a sign „Platz der Begegnung“ in the inner court yard. It is not a street sign proper, but maybe we’ll maybe map it nonetheless. |
152908585 | about 1 year ago | Thank you for resolving this and many other notes of mine! |
47177001 | about 1 year ago | Seconded, railway=disused is indeed inappropriate. Maybe we can call it an art installation or monument instead? Currently this feature is flagged as “Line has not descriptive tags.” It is just a warning, but still. |
149465646 | about 1 year ago | Is there a source on the ground confirming this new name? |
143026820 | about 1 year ago | This appears to be a duplicate of node 1098621675. Did you mean to _move_ node 1098621675 to the position of the newly created node 11283977670? |
113625970 | over 1 year ago | Did you mean to connect nodes 9241598605, 9241598608, 9241598606 and 9241598607 with edges to form the outline of a building? |
71420435 | over 1 year ago | Your waterfall is not connected to any waterways. Is this a mistake? |
73338434 | almost 2 years ago | There’s an issue with way 713616005. On OSM `area` is not used to indicate the surface area. (You can calculate it from the polygon anyway.) |
29814508 | almost 2 years ago | Is the change on polygon 4741068 appropriate? The building 237010759 is already tagged as amenity=kindergarten. According to the wiki one area comprising all kindergarten facilities should be tagged as amenity=kindergarten. |
139001745 | about 2 years ago | I’m pretty sure 11067450206 is on the greenstrip _between_ the road and sidewalk. |
10706369 | over 2 years ago | The Periodista Evaristo Cantero (way 150691457) has a “disconnected from the rest of the network” issue. Could you add the missing link? From the looks of it, maybe area=yes is missing, too? |
128331290 | over 2 years ago | Thank you for edit. There is already way 783705460 → osm.org/way/783705460 that documents this building. I have deleted your building now, see changeset 135512876 → osm.org/changeset/135512876 |
132489612 | over 2 years ago | Changeset comment has been truncated. This is the second URL: https://www.Northeim.de/startseite-details/aktuelle-situation-und-zukunft-der-bruecken-am-brunkelskamp.html |
82590101 | over 2 years ago | Du brauchst mich nicht zu fragen. Die Änderungen klingen plausibel. |
126557818 | almost 3 years ago | This change is wrong:
|
42244705 | almost 3 years ago | Danke für die Rückmeldung. Ich habe den Knotenpunkt entfernt (Changeset #124511724). |
42244705 | almost 3 years ago | This needs clarification. |
88367459 | over 4 years ago | Confirmed: Turn restriction has been lifted. Thank you for pointing that out. |
61544888 | almost 7 years ago | lol, “Baufortschritte” mit hashtag allesKaputt |