Kovoschiz's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
67427509 | over 6 years ago | The end Rumsey Street Flyover isn't defined this way. Refer to IEC western end. It's not a `_link`. |
67649473 | over 6 years ago | This does not make sense. Not only is it not part of Route 8 per international and local guidelines, it is very likely to be a primary distributor road per Transport Department classification supporting it as a `highway=primary`. You shoud rather downgrade Sky Plaza Road and Cheong Wong Road if you wish to reflect its status. I will revert it first until the community discussed the policy, and tag it with motorroad=yes. |
67734314 | over 6 years ago | >* Lai Yip St - Elegance Road fixing. |
67140278 | over 6 years ago | Yiu Sing Street eastbound: osm.org/way/160554418, osm.org/way/168893306, osm.org/way/168893311.
|
67176260 | over 6 years ago | I didn't agree with the ends being secondary_link either, but my point is the whole road should be highway=motorway, even though it is short and currently functions as a link road only. |
67140278 | over 6 years ago | >* I also wonder whether the sections of Man Yiu Street and Yiu Sing Street from Man Street to Lung Wo Road should be upgraded, as they now serve traffic coming off the trunk road to the highway=primary Lung Wo Road and onto further destinations in other areas and districts eastwards. |
67140278 | over 6 years ago | That's what it may look like. However, Central Interchange is asymmetric, so are the connecting roads. While I understand the desire to keep the symmetry of classification, this doesn't seem to reflect their importances well. My current view is that Man Po Street is a trunk_link from the end of the highway=trunk Rumsey Street Flyover osm.org/way/664762490 to the intersection. I also doubt whether the sections of Man Yiu Street and Yiu Sing Street from Man Street to Lung Wo Road should be upgraded, as they now serve traffic coming off there to the highway=primary and onto further destinations. |
67176260 | over 6 years ago | Please leave a comment next time. May I know why this is a motorway_link? Penny's Bay Highway is a named road, and full expressway. It is not just a link road (not OSM links), even then it can be a motorway. It is supposed to be extended, and is only ending at Magic Road Interchange. For Hong Kong examples, Sha Lek Highway, the future Shatin T4 road, and Shun Long Road (Tuen Mun - Chap Lap Kok Link Southern Section) are all highway=motorway. |
67581939 | over 6 years ago | So it may be partitioned to be unnamed. |
67581939 | over 6 years ago | You are right. Thx for comment on osm.org/changeset/67417570.
|
67054913 | over 6 years ago | That's not the right way to fix. It's a tunnel area. |
67362086 | over 6 years ago | Why would you "fix" by creating a conflict on layer? Did you ignore the warning? |
67417570 | over 6 years ago | Aside from designating it as highway=motorway instead of motorway_link. |
67417570 | over 6 years ago | Can you explain your unsourced and non-standard naming of Hung Hing Road bus-only lane? |
67140278 | over 6 years ago | Can you explain how Man Po St is secondary? Not sure how you get this "per imagery". |
67177753 | over 6 years ago | osm.org/way/135619198 should be primary_link, continuing from osm.org/way/135619198. |
67177753 | over 6 years ago | Oh sorry I didn't mean that. I actually misread them as service in my mind while looking at them as residential. I was indeed thinking about keeping the section consistent and uniform. They should be single-designation-long link roads, being either primary_link (most of them) or trunk_link (for past-Expressway connection roads)
|
67177753 | over 6 years ago | I would keep Way:562205337 as highway:residential.
|
66765129 | over 6 years ago | WIP |
66764510 | over 6 years ago | WIP |