OpenStreetMap
MannequinBaby's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by MannequinBaby
| Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 406051 | Address number verification needed |
||||
| 412093 | Dani_770 | Unmarked Buildings, no outline or address |
|||
| 412719 | edgrmdna | Street sign reads "Navajo Court" but houses addressed "Navajo Ave" on PermitView: http://www.sloplanning.org/PermitView/MapSearch |
|||
| 396999 | Dani_770 | Is Ritter Way a real street? |
|||
| 397002 | Dani_770 | Is Peacock Way a real street? |
|||
| 382765 | Houses in this area need address verification |
||||
| 397890 | j03lar50n | what kind of crop is this? vineyard? |
|||
| 466807 | MannequinBaby | Tracks in this area should probably be residential. "highway=track" does not imply condition or surface of the road. But rather the use of the road. The use of the road was and is set up as residential. The surface is most likely dirt or unpaved, but I think the "highway=" tag should be residential. Thoughts? osm.wiki/Key:highway |
|||
| 447558 | Check addresses. |
||||
| 340144 | Dry Canyon Street/Road. |