Hello, this was a mistake, thanks for pointing it out. I have now resolved it.
osm.org/changeset/165451814

Thanks for your comment and apologies for the late reply. I have now corrected this.
osm.org/changeset/165451718

I see that the other two ways are tagged as grass. Was this the original intention?

Hi leheng, this changeset created an untagged way. Can you check if this is an unintended mistake?
osm.org/way/1152836457

Hi DrunkParisian, greetings! Thanks for mapping the different cemeteries within Bukit Brown.
I noticed that you have used several lines as part of the multipolygon relations, instead of simply creating closed areas for the different areas. Is there a reason for this? Would you be okay if I modify the relations to convert these into areas?
Cheers

I am also concerned about the adequacy (and usefulness) of tagging dropoff points for shared bicycles. I myself have mapped sporadically in the past, though not in a consistent fashion.

When reading through the wiki for 'bicycle_rental', the case of Singapore borders the case of virtual drop-offs, or 'bicycle_parking=floor'.

osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbicycle_rental#When_to_use_a_different_tagging_scheme

Keen to read your thoughts!

Hi ADsdjk23
Thanks for your reply and for your contribution. Looking at the wiki explanation for this specific item, it seems like public access ('yes') is applicable in these cases, at least in public housing, parks and roadside racks.

Sharing for your reference:
osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbicycle_parking#Tags

Hi ADsdjk23. May I inquire why you consider that bicycle parking racks at HDB void decks should be tagged as 'access=permissive'? Anyone can use these for their personal use.
Open to hear your point of view!

Hi nicholas77, the features added in this changeset do not reflect the reality on the ground. It will be reverted along with other erroneous changesets in the area.

Hi nicholas77, the features added in this changeset do not reflect the reality on the ground. It will be reverted along with other erroneous changesets in the area.

Hi nicholas77, the features added in this changeset do not reflect the reality in the ground. It will be reverted along with other erroneous changesets in the area.