MarkusHD's Comments
Post | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
security camera | Don’t forget to close your notes after having edited the real map data now. |
|
Github HowTo: Clone Repository then make a Pull Request | GitHub’s pricing had been changed a few days before your diary post. You now have unlimited private repositories with your free account. |
|
Nonsense values of shop= key | Don’t take it too serious. I did understand the purpose of your example, I just explained why “gift” was a bad choice. Since you very much emphasizes consistent and clear tagging, I think it is perfectly fine for a short nitpicking. I didn’t want to start a needless discussion about that specific key. No, Don’t get me wrong. Despite my comments I might even agree with parts of your statements. |
|
Nonsense values of shop= key | “Gifts” is a bad choice in this discussion. What is a gift? You can buy any article as a gift for someone - from a cup to a car. You can even buy an article in a Now rejecting the “car” example and assuming we have a similar view about what a gift is in this context: A more or less small object, which an average person can carry on its own and from which the majority of people think it would be a good idea for use as a present, sometimes if they just have no better idea. And I’m sure this view also only applies to sort of modern areas in the world, so it is still kind of a local assumption for an international project (even if it’s not bound to national flavors). Now the particular articles, and let it just be article groups or categories, are such a big variety that |
|
Nonsense values of shop= key | You talk about searchability. But natural language, which you call inconsistent for tagging, is exactly the language people use for searching. |