OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
140984852 almost 2 years ago

Hallo NationalparkSchwarzwald,

Die von dir bearbeitete Grenze teilte sich einen Punkt mit einer Bundesstraße. Beim verschönern der Grenze bzw Verschieben dieses Punkte hast du versehentlich ein Zickzack in die Bundesstraße eingebaut...

Ich habe den Knoten aufgetrennt und die Bundesstraße wieder begradigt:
osm.org/changeset/141042944#map=16/48.5307/8.2175&layers=N

Ein schönes Beispiel, weshalb man Flächen (Park) nicht an Linien (Straße) heften sollte, dann passieren so Missgeschicke mal schnell :-)

Viele Grüße
Metzor

141000594 almost 2 years ago

Hi Ar99,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

140983509 almost 2 years ago

Hi Vierkantor,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Please also habe a look at this page as you use StreetComplete:
osm.wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#A_changeset_made_with_StreetComplete_covers_a_massive_area%2C_why_is_this%3F_How_can_it_be_prevented%3F

140978366 almost 2 years ago

Hi Sander

Thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Maybe also have a look here:
osm.wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#A_changeset_made_with_StreetComplete_covers_a_massive_area%2C_why_is_this%3F_How_can_it_be_prevented%3F

140950645 almost 2 years ago

There is even a wiki page on this issue...
Seems to happen to the best 🤣

osm.wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#A_changeset_made_with_StreetComplete_covers_a_massive_area%2C_why_is_this%3F_How_can_it_be_prevented%3F

140952778 almost 2 years ago

Hallo dreiachtel,

Ich würde mich freuen, wenn du die geografische Größe deiner Uploads etwas kleiner halten würdest, siehe

osm.wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#A_changeset_made_with_StreetComplete_covers_a_massive_area%2C_why_is_this%3F_How_can_it_be_prevented%3F

Und
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Danke :-)

140950645 almost 2 years ago

Hi nobodyinperson,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

140948274 almost 2 years ago

Hi Lantander,

(A late) Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

140935748 almost 2 years ago

Hi Pandoril,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

140822344 almost 2 years ago

Hi bn_1000,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

140805097 almost 2 years ago

Hi Dewi Jonker,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

140526447 almost 2 years ago

Hallo znaika,

Jetzt ist das routing im brouter richtig drin.
Danke fürs Reparieren :-)

140768543 almost 2 years ago

Hi HV2023,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

137730906 almost 2 years ago

Hi HarteKarte,

Die ausgewählten Wege in der Relation wären für "nur geradeaus" gültig. Diese gibt es aber ja schon und sehe ich auch auf mapillary-Bildern von 2017. Wurde das Schild auf ein Rechtsabbiegeverbot geändert? Dann müsste man die Relation hier so ändern, dass der (südliche) Kennerweg als (einziges) "to"-Mitglied drin steht und könnte dann die geradeaus-Relation löschen. Oder?

Wie kann ich eigentlich "siehe Foto in Kommentar hier" für mich sichtbar machen?
Viele Grüße
Metzor

140671368 almost 2 years ago

Hi ticki_52,

Mir scheint, du hast in diesem Änderungssatz die uturn-Relation ausversehen kaputt gemacht:
V1 hatte from/via/to
V2 to/via/to

Habe es wieder zurück geändert und das überflüssige (und unvollständige) Linksabbiegeverbot gelöscht.

Hoffe, das war ok so und stimmt nun.

Viele Grüße
Metzor

140596358 almost 2 years ago

Hallo Hunt4target,

Mir scheint, dir ist vor 2 Jahren ein kleiner Fehler unterlaufen...
Hast du den Blitzer unabsichtlich verschoben?
Oder nur die Reihenfolge der Straßenknoten nicht korrigiert?

osm.org/node/2401791633/history

Ich wollte in Unkenntnis des Standortes nicht die Straße einfach begradigen. Magst du das fixen?

Gruß
Metzor

140526447 almost 2 years ago

Hallo znaika,

Ich schreibe, weil brouter sich beschwert, dass man von Westen auf der L402 kommend die Auffahrt auf die A59 nicht über die "richtige" Fahrspur befahren kann.
So wie ich das sehe, liegt es an der "Nur geradeaus"-Relation
osm.org/relation/16253212/history#map=19/51.09735/6.92721
Vermutlich wolltest du diese einen Knoten östlicher anlegen?

In der richtigen Reihenfolge hast du ja bereits eine Relation angelegt:
osm.org/relation/16253218/history

Hier das routing:
https://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=18/51.09738/6.92726/standard&lonlats=6.926735,51.097148;6.928055,51.097182&profile=car-eco

Ich kenne die Gegend nicht, vielleicht könntest du mal reinschauen?

Viele Grüße
Metzor

140722112 almost 2 years ago

Hi,

thanks a lot :-)

139504190 almost 2 years ago

Hallo kiradonner,

Mir scheint, du hast ausversehen zwei Knoten der L1100 verschoben:
* kurz vor der Auffahrt
* Brücke (grauer Hintergrund)

Vorher/nachher siehe z.B.hier:
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=139504190#19/49.18397/9.20152

Könntest du das bitte reparieren?

Ist mir in Vespucci beim Hinundherwischen leider auch schon passiert. Das Schloss-Feature hilft ;-)

Viele Grüße
Metzor

140722112 almost 2 years ago

Hi ratrun,

How do you come to the conclusion that the service way (description=Zufahrt P 1) connects to the street Christian-Völter-Straße instead of the building tagged as parking garage named P1?

The service way actually is a tunnel below the Hotel building, below Christian-V-street, connecting underground to the parking garage building.

Please correct your edit or revert it. Thanks!
Best regards
Metzor