Metzor's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
140984852 | almost 2 years ago | Hallo NationalparkSchwarzwald, Die von dir bearbeitete Grenze teilte sich einen Punkt mit einer Bundesstraße. Beim verschönern der Grenze bzw Verschieben dieses Punkte hast du versehentlich ein Zickzack in die Bundesstraße eingebaut... Ich habe den Knoten aufgetrennt und die Bundesstraße wieder begradigt:
Ein schönes Beispiel, weshalb man Flächen (Park) nicht an Linien (Straße) heften sollte, dann passieren so Missgeschicke mal schnell :-) Viele Grüße
|
141000594 | almost 2 years ago | Hi Ar99, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
140983509 | almost 2 years ago | Hi Vierkantor, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! Please also habe a look at this page as you use StreetComplete:
|
140978366 | almost 2 years ago | Hi Sander Thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! Maybe also have a look here:
|
140950645 | almost 2 years ago | There is even a wiki page on this issue...
|
140952778 | almost 2 years ago | Hallo dreiachtel, Ich würde mich freuen, wenn du die geografische Größe deiner Uploads etwas kleiner halten würdest, siehe Und
Danke :-) |
140950645 | almost 2 years ago | Hi nobodyinperson, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
140948274 | almost 2 years ago | Hi Lantander, (A late) Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
140935748 | almost 2 years ago | Hi Pandoril, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
140822344 | almost 2 years ago | Hi bn_1000, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
140805097 | almost 2 years ago | Hi Dewi Jonker, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
140526447 | almost 2 years ago | Hallo znaika, Jetzt ist das routing im brouter richtig drin.
|
140768543 | almost 2 years ago | Hi HV2023, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) One general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
137730906 | almost 2 years ago | Hi HarteKarte, Die ausgewählten Wege in der Relation wären für "nur geradeaus" gültig. Diese gibt es aber ja schon und sehe ich auch auf mapillary-Bildern von 2017. Wurde das Schild auf ein Rechtsabbiegeverbot geändert? Dann müsste man die Relation hier so ändern, dass der (südliche) Kennerweg als (einziges) "to"-Mitglied drin steht und könnte dann die geradeaus-Relation löschen. Oder? Wie kann ich eigentlich "siehe Foto in Kommentar hier" für mich sichtbar machen?
|
140671368 | almost 2 years ago | Hi ticki_52, Mir scheint, du hast in diesem Änderungssatz die uturn-Relation ausversehen kaputt gemacht:
Habe es wieder zurück geändert und das überflüssige (und unvollständige) Linksabbiegeverbot gelöscht. Hoffe, das war ok so und stimmt nun. Viele Grüße
|
140596358 | almost 2 years ago | Hallo Hunt4target, Mir scheint, dir ist vor 2 Jahren ein kleiner Fehler unterlaufen...
osm.org/node/2401791633/history Ich wollte in Unkenntnis des Standortes nicht die Straße einfach begradigen. Magst du das fixen? Gruß
|
140526447 | almost 2 years ago | Hallo znaika, Ich schreibe, weil brouter sich beschwert, dass man von Westen auf der L402 kommend die Auffahrt auf die A59 nicht über die "richtige" Fahrspur befahren kann.
In der richtigen Reihenfolge hast du ja bereits eine Relation angelegt:
Hier das routing:
Ich kenne die Gegend nicht, vielleicht könntest du mal reinschauen? Viele Grüße
|
140722112 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, thanks a lot :-) |
139504190 | almost 2 years ago | Hallo kiradonner, Mir scheint, du hast ausversehen zwei Knoten der L1100 verschoben:
Vorher/nachher siehe z.B.hier:
Könntest du das bitte reparieren? Ist mir in Vespucci beim Hinundherwischen leider auch schon passiert. Das Schloss-Feature hilft ;-) Viele Grüße
|
140722112 | almost 2 years ago | Hi ratrun, How do you come to the conclusion that the service way (description=Zufahrt P 1) connects to the street Christian-Völter-Straße instead of the building tagged as parking garage named P1? The service way actually is a tunnel below the Hotel building, below Christian-V-street, connecting underground to the parking garage building. Please correct your edit or revert it. Thanks!
|