Note that osm.wiki/United_States_Road_Classification hasn’t gotten much attention from the community. osm.wiki/Ohio/Map_features is specific to Ohio and is what most of Ohio is consistent with.

Thanks!

Hi, you may be interested in the discussion in osm.wiki/Talk:Indiana#SR_for_state_roads , where I’ve proposed that we standardize on the “SR” prefix for ref tags on state roads in Indiana.

demolished:building=yes should be used in place of building=yes, not in addition to it. Thanks!

Also corrected tagging of channelized turn lanes.

Oh, never mind, I found 15 mph speed limit signs further up the road. Fixed.

Are there any signs for the speed limits inside Creekside Village? I noticed that the speed limits are tagged as 12 km/h, but I can’t find either 12 km/h or 7½ mph speed limit signs in the complex, just “slow down” signs.

These references may be helpful:

osm.wiki/Tag:highway=stop
osm.wiki/Key:maxspeed:advisory
osm.wiki/Key:traffic_sign
osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66870047 where the changeset comment is: Reverted changeset 66869945: JOSM mangled the upload after a network connection error

Yes, I think “Cincinnati Columbus Road;Columbus Cincinnati Road” would be the most appropriate name. It’s sort of like how bilingual areas will have multiple names in name, even though the name:xy tags are also tagged on the same feature. In this case, both this road and Cincinnati Dayton Road run parallel in the same township, creating some potential for confusion if a road is announced with a different name than the signage.

Unfortunately, OSRM doesn’t know how to use name:forward and name:backward, so both names will be announced. But there are lots of roads in the Midwest that have very different names on each side of the road, so I think it’s a bug that will eventually need to be fixed anyways.

Thanks as always for being responsive to changeset comments. This is admittedly an edge case, so I understand why you might’ve thought it was appropriate to simplify the name.

I disagree with the road name change in this changeset. As seen in https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/4544#issuecomment-335339773, both “Cincinnati Columbus Road” and “Columbus Cincinnati Road” are signposted equally prominently depending on the direction of travel.

Hi, thanks for contributing your business details to OSM. Unfortunately, I had to revert this change in changeset 66723568, because you accidentally renamed 18th Avenue instead of adding your business. You can try again, but this time, please select the building that houses your business, rather than the street, before adding the name and details. Thank you.

This reverts changeset 66118008, which incorrectly conflated a business with the street it’s on.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66696873 where the changeset comment is: Reverted changeset 46690365: Pokémon Go flora and fauna

Thanks for untangling this road and all its turn restrictions into a proper dual carriageway. That must’ve been quite tedious! Unfortunately, this changeset introduced numerous routing errors, including broken road and bus route relations, missing turn restrictions, and missing traffic lights and crosswalks. A highly trafficked left turn from Colerain onto I-275 was deleted. Lane counts and turn lanes also became inaccurate, because :backward tags weren’t moved over to the new parallel way. These errors have been fixed in changesets 66490305 and 66501664. In the future, please try to copy the existing way more comprehensively when creating a parallel way for a dual carriageway – that would prevent most of the errors that occurred here. Thank you for your help!

The Torrey Pines subdivision doesn’t extend to all these properties. If you want to express that these adjoining properties are residential, please create a separate landuse area that isn’t named.

Hi, thanks for adding buildings and sidewalks in the area. Please remember to connect the sidewalks to the road network, for example by adding crossing ways that intersect with streets. That way, walking routers will use the sidewalks instead of avoiding them because of the extra detours around cul-de-sacs. Thanks again!

This changeset reverts changeset 65776972 because it duplicated changeset 65776820.

This changeset duplicated changeset 65776820, so it was reverted in changeset 66287502.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66287502 where the changeset comment is: