That’s a bug in Wikimedia’s geoline service. [1] As a workaround, you can still query for one of these relations, convert it to GeoJSON, and upload it to Commons. The AARoads Wiki (a fork of Wikipedia) has a decent tutorial for creating these maps [2], although Wikimedia’s Kartographer extension is a bit pickier when it comes to bounding boxes:

[1] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T156433
[2] https://wiki.aaroads.com/wiki/AARoads:Maps/Creating_a_GeoJSON_file_from_OpenStreetMap

Subarea relation members aren’t really a good idea overall; this is what spatial queries are for…

Fixed in changeset 143076741.

I used the iD preset for rolled curbs. The bug in OSRM is being tracked in https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/6582 .

Also, the AARoads Wiki maintains a variation of this style that makes certain routes easier to follow at a glance; it makes use of the same standard tagging:

https://aaroads-wiki.github.io/openstreetmap-americana/

Hi, please see this guide for the standard tags for each route network:

osm.wiki/United_States_roads_tagging/Routes

In this case, future I-27 would be tagged network=US:I:Future and ref=27, not network=US:I and ref=I-27 (which would imply a present-day Interstate I-27).

If you haven’t seen it yet, I highly recommend checking out OSM Americana, an alternative map style that correctly renders route shields based on route relations:

https://zelonewolf.github.io/openstreetmap-americana/

Annnd… article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinlenville

Added to OpenHistoricalMap in https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/changeset/95544

Added more of Heinlenville in https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/changeset/95544 and Pinoytown in https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/changeset/95545

Thought you might be interested to know that one map style was rendering these emoji, though ideally it would render something more faithful to the logos:

https://github.com/ZeLonewolf/openstreetmap-americana/issues/451#issuecomment-1169406462

This also removed “name=Purchase Parkway” from many but not all of the ways, resulting in haphazard rendering in the OSM Americana style.

These refs are unsignposted and were already in unsigned_ref.

osm.org/changeset/142685666

Hi, the Route Number field (ref key) is only for signposted route numbers. The route numbers you added were already present, but in the unsigned_ref key so that they wouldn’t confuse motorists who are looking at signs on the ground.

Hi, thanks for detailing these historic neighborhoods. It would be better to add this detail to OpenHistoricalMap – not only the place POI but also the streets and buildings. Here’s a starting point: https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/node/2106979221 I’d love to have your help in building up coverage of this historic area of town.

Changeset 142595843 promotes the minor through streets to highway=tertiary.

Changeset 142589542 adds the apartment buildings’ addresses and also restores the overall development’s landuse area, which had gotten conflated with the plot next to the park where the Center for Creative Arts is being built.

I don’t consider the Wikipedia links to be essential, but for completeness’ sake since they have been added:

• Created <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinlenville> and <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Jose_Department_of_Parks,_Recreation_%26_Neighborhood_Services> as redirects to less specific articles with the hidden <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:R_with_possibilities> tag.
• Added these titles to <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q123023841< and <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q106709038>, respectively, as “intentional sitelinks to redirects”.
• Retagged the park with these titles in changeset 142589542.

Hopefully any validator or bot that tries to reconcile the Wikipedia and Wikidata items will recognize that the redirects are intentional and not a signal of tagging inconsistency.

Thank you for taking an interest in this neighborhood!

I agree that many of the city’s parks lack an address [1], but this park has a different address than either of the apartment buildings in the complex [2], because the block was subdivided into parcels with addresses long before the park was built.

[1] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/your-government/departments-offices/parks-recreation-neighborhood-services/parks-trails/search-parks-playgrounds
[2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/Home/Components/Calendar/Event/6502/

Fallbacks don’t always work well, because bots go around replacing the more specific Wikidata tags with less specific ones based on the Wikipedia tags (e.g., changeset 140125562).

Changeset 142281921 removes the route and merges the stations with still-extant features on the ground. Please do let me know if you’d like any help contributing this information to OpenHistoricalMap.