Is there a reason why you chose the zone sign when answering the speed limit quest in StreetComplete, given 30 zones do not exist in the UK?

That is peculiar, since I have never seen anything regarding this as a non-primary road here, including signs, maps, etc. I might clarify myself where exactly the primary roads in Hastings are.

Are there signs with 60 in a red ring here?

Hi, the tag maxspeed:type=GB:zone30 is incorrect. Please do not use this tag. If the road is lit with a 30 mph speed limit, use maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_restricted. If the road is unlit with a 30 mph speed limit, use maxspeed:type=sign

Hi, the tag maxspeed:type=GB:zone30 is incorrect. Please do not use this tag. If the road is lit with a 30 mph speed limit, use maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_restricted. If the road is unlit with a 30 mph speed limit, use maxspeed:type=sign

Hi, the tag maxspeed:type=GB:zone30 is incorrect. Please do not use this tag. If the road is lit with a 30 mph speed limit, use maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_restricted. If the road is unlit with a 30 mph speed limit, use maxspeed:type=sign

Hi, the tag maxspeed:type=GB:zone30 is incorrect. Please do not use this tag. If the road is lit with a 30 mph speed limit, use maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_restricted. If the road is unlit with a 30 mph speed limit, use maxspeed:type=sign

Hi, please can you redo the junction area using the advice on the wiki? See here for how to construct properly, thanks.
osm.wiki/Tag:junction%3Dyes#How_to_use_on_an_area

highway=trunk and highway=trunk_link have the same status, the latter represents slip roads. And yes, all slip roads should be highway=x_link, it's just that in some special cases, like the southern junction of the A38 and A516 here, there's no definite point where slip road turns into main road, and so the whole slip road is marked as trunk. In this northern junction, there is a definite end point - the roundabout. Hence these should be marked as trunk_link. The ref or route of any road is irrelevant, as per my example of the A515/A50 multiplex.

Fine, I'll just paste what I wrote last time...

Again, just because these ramps *are* the A516, that doesn't mean they *have* to be highway=trunk. The wiki page for highway=trunk_link even says "Use highway=trunk_link for link roads (sliproads and ramps) leading to and from a highway=trunk." As I have seen many times before, the sign colour could be incorrect. For example, there's a green sign here (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&lat=52.9124875&lng=-1.5158363888889&z=17&pKey=211770674253287&x=0.4926006856509276&y=0.5588215907497979&zoom=0) and yet this section of road is marked as a non-primary route (in OSM, highway=primary). So is it marked wrong, or is the sign wrong? Many signs before 1994 - and indeed newer copies - use an outdated colour coding system, and it looks as though this is the case with the roundabout direction signs on the A516 having left the A38. The signs on the off-ramp should be black and white. There are quite a few multiplexes like this, another example being the A50 and A515 to the west of here. All the A515 ramps to/from the A50 at Ashbourne are marked highway=trunk_link. As you say, the ramps at Mickleover should also be marked as highway=trunk_link, but this is a grey area as there is no defined start/finish point of the ramps after they have left the A38, as the A516 is a dual carriageway here. So I would leave the road tagged as highway=trunk throughout in this case. Same for the M26/M20 junction for instance. Unless there is a specified reason, these should be highway=trunk_link. The wiki says so, convention says so. The ref is irrelevant.

No, you're making things up now.

So you don't respond to the comments I made before and just revert with the argument you made last time?

So you don't respond to the comments I made before and just revert with the argument you made last time?

I have reverted your changes on the restricted roads in the city centre. The correct tags for the restrictions were already in place, and were already at the correct extents. Please read the wiki for future guidance on how to mark such restrictions, as "motor_vehicle=bus" is not a valid tag.

Hi, 30 zones do not exist in the UK. For roads with a 30 mph speed limit, either the road is lit and maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_restricted, or the road is not lit and maxspeed:type=sign

Is this standard tagging? Why isn't this in the wiki?

Not familiar with that way, so I can't comment. But in this case the road is definitely not oneway for buses, cycles and taxis. Only the entrance by the station is restricted. If one wants to use OSM purely as a visual aid then there are dozens of restrictions not marked or either unclear at any zoom level.

I believe it is widely accepted that the status of highways in the UK is reflected by trunk, primary and secondary roads (primary route, non-primary route, and B-road). The class of road may not necessarily reflect the use, as here, but nonetheless it is still a primary route.

There is a green sign at the Cornwallis Terrace end, but only parking signs at the southern end. These are always white regardless of primary status.

The road is not oneway. There is no bus lane running opposite to the direction of traffic, just a bus gate at the northern end restricting access. This is represented by turning restrictions mapped at the station junction. Drivers will not be routed along the road in the southern direction due to these.

Devonshire Road and South Terrace are not A or B-roads. They should not be trunk, primary, or secondary ways.

I would think so, though I was just correcting the maxspeed:type tag rather than the maxspeed tag itself. I cannot verify the maxspeed tag so I won't change it.

If that is the case then please feel free to undo this changeset