Hi, please only use the PTv2 tag when the route is fully tagged as according. I have removed the tags for now.

Just so you know, last night I updated all of the City Red routes and converted them to the new Bluestar ones (though not all to PTv2). I see you have been redoing some routes, but they have not been up to the PTv2 standard. You can see details here about adding a bus route: osm.wiki/Buses#Adding_a_bus_route_to_OpenStreetMap

For examples, see the Unilink U2 route for a PTv2 setup.

I am not sure that is designated tactile paving. Could be perhaps something by the kerb manufacturer but even then it is not mentioned at all in the current tactile paving regs. Though saying that, nothing at all is mentioned for bus stops. All I will say is that this example is a clear tactile_paving=yes (I don't have a photo, so a google link will have to do): https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@50.9135746,-1.4902548,3a,48.9y,310.56h,70.09t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1svNuQGJ-xTY7S4-UGT9sstg!2e0!5s20180501T000000!7i16384!8i8192

So for these cases I would recommend applying tactile_paving=no for these kerbstones. They don't look too resistant as well, so perhaps with time the textured surface would wear away.

Hi, can you confirm what the tactile paving looked like at these stops, just to make sure you've marked the tag as yes correctly?

My mistake, I must have forgot to redraw it after amending the ways of the roundabout.

Well at least the toll booth has the correct payment methods still. These individual lane allocations could possibly be re-added with the lanes tag (e.g. payment:coins:lanes=no|yes|yes etc.)

The payment info is still there and is tagged on the toll booth building, so not sure what you mean?

Are there road signs prohibiting pedestrians from this road?

Hi.

Don't trust signage all the time. I know of multiple occasions where primary/non-primary signs are incorrectly used. I'd highly doubt that this new short two-way link between two primary (trunk in OSM) routes would be unclassified/tertiary, hence why I changed it when I saw it.

It could be part of the A2 instead of the A28 - not sure. Change it to that ref if you feel so. What I do know is it's not both numbers, and not none.

The KCC public highways map has not been updated yet so the status and number can't be determined for sure as it stands. Until then, this is probably the best tagging to use.

Nathan

I am not familiar with the StreetComplete people so please go ahead. The relevant wiki page is here osm.wiki/Key:maxheight

My point above still stands so please only tag the way directly below the bridge when you add maxheight tags

All motorway bridges should be a default height, only ones that have a low height I can recall are in Leeds. The Max Height Map does not include motorways as roads missing maxheight tags. Nonetheless, you do not add max height tags to the entire road - only tag the way directly under the bridge (see the wiki for more info)

Do motorways need maxheight tags? It's implied that the maxheight of bridges on them is default unless stated

Are there signs like this along this section of road prohibiting pedestrians?
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:UK_traffic_sign_625.1.svg

Bus routes should be mapped to PTv2. If they are not, then upgrade them if you know how. Please don't mess around with things if you are going to cause so many other issues.

How and why have you duplicated so many roads along the existing Bluestar 17 route?

You have broken a lot of road segments and introduced multiple errors. Please fix.

Why is Elphinstone Road now all squiggly?

This has and will be in place for a number of years to facilitate the works of HS2. It's more a common name than an official name so if you wish to delete it please do.

Hi, there are indeed no signs prohibiting pedestrians you are correct, on reflection adding such a tag was incorrect. Please edit if necessary.