Nathan_A_RF's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
93778124 | over 3 years ago | I assume the signs have changed then, as I recall that a prohibition with an "except buses" plate was used before. Please feel free to make any corrections. |
118929057 | over 3 years ago | If you can find a source that refers to it as that, though I've never heard the A2 from Lydden Hill to the docks ever referred to as "Dover Bypass" despite bypassing Dover. The latter part already has the name Jubilee Way too. |
118881456 | over 3 years ago | The wiki page states "Ideally, each end of the bridge should correspond to the point where the bridge's abutment ends and an opening begins below the bridge". This is what I have done in this edit, only map the bridge itself as part of the area and not the solid abutments. Now I do notice that it states that the segment under the bridge should not be connected to it, which I will correct now. |
113260427 | almost 4 years ago | Hmm well I'll switch them around if it's more consistent with other mapping but I still feel it's the wrong way around. It doesn't help that the wiki doesn't go into much detail with multiple nodes tagged as traffic signals. |
113260427 | almost 4 years ago | Are you sure this is the case? The wiki seems to indicate the opposite although that is the junction node being tagged with the traffic light. All vehicles including bicycles need to stop before the traffic light. |
111068364 | almost 4 years ago | Local knowledge |
111046069 | almost 4 years ago | Local knowledge |
111020329 | almost 4 years ago | There are no length prohibition road signs from personal memory of when I holidayed in Pembrokeshire a couple years ago (double checked and backed up by a Geograph image). The signs state unsuitable for vehicles over 16 feet. |
109886002 | almost 4 years ago | The jagged roads are fixed now. |
109886002 | almost 4 years ago | The junction may be called 'Bowdon Interchange' but the road segments themselves do not have that name. As for the jaggedness, I believe a recent revert by another user cause those. Sorry. I shall fix now. |
110819652 | almost 4 years ago | Source for this is local knowledge, the entire street here should be tertiary, not just one little bit with the rest residential. Marked the same as the one way streets through the centre here. |
110572864 | almost 4 years ago | Thanks for that, is it okay to send a list sometime in the week of changesets to revert? |
110572864 | almost 4 years ago | Is there anywhere that also states banned sources? I can't find a list on the wiki |
110572864 | almost 4 years ago | Is there any way of easily seeing all of my edits at once? |
110572864 | almost 4 years ago | Sorry, was trying to comment but you had blocked me |
110572864 | almost 4 years ago | Well pretty much all of my edits are to places I have been, so I use my own experience for those alone. For this particular edit I used street view to check I was correct, as I have done a few times in the past. Similarly with mapillary - these I use to assist my memory and personal pictures, not directly map from. I would have to go back through all 2,000 of my edits to try and locate maybe like 30 edits? |
110572864 | almost 4 years ago | I don't solely use Street View for my edits, but a combination of sources to ensure the mapping is correct. |
110644410 | almost 4 years ago | Fine, revert if you want. It's the same either way, I just thought it doesn't look aesthetically pleasing as two segments. |
110644410 | almost 4 years ago | I have been past here many a time too. It's correctly mapped (monument + traffic island). What's the issue? |
110572864 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, the sources I use are mainly Google Street View and personal experience. I've added restrictions from signage and the latest street view images (checking it is up to date of course). If anything is incorrect I apologise. |