looks like these didn't get the GNISID value retained in gnis:feature_id, for example osm.org/node/4065344346 is
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140390872

please use the alt_name tag instead of deleting the old name. Steeves Pass is the name in Ropers book. I don’t care which is used as the primary name, just that both names are retained.

"natural=XC Pass" isn't a commonly used tag, for cross country passes use "natural=saddle". if the pass carries a highway, like a hiking trail, then it can also be tagged with "mountain_pass=yes".

the location also appeared to be slightly off.

I've fixed both of these issues in osm.org/changeset/139448208

thanks for the contribution!

no need to name these pois unless they have a name, can you remove the name?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138733489

why do you believe this road to be a secondary? you've upgraded it from unclassified, to tertiary, to secondary?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138166004

old proposed roads and fully destroyed roads don’t belong here, please remove them and add them to https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ (or some other site) instead
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138165711

this used to be an old trail that was still serviceable as a use trail.. has it been destroyed in recent times?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137616362

please use better statewide references before upgrading all of the road tags, Tioga Pass Road for example is secondary
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137213677

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=12&lat=37.3207&lon=-119.1773 can also help highlight problems in the map

these are not link roads nor secondary, please read osm.wiki/Highway_link and osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified

trail updates around the GTW and eastern Sequoia, added bridge details, Volcano Falls and a few more buildings

if it's a name that would be used on an mailing address then `name` is fine... otherwise I'd use `loc_name` or maybe `alt_name` depending on how common it is. just something like `loc_name=The Four Lane` without quotes should be good. the road number is pulled from the `ref` tag so you don't need to add it again

when a creek runs under a road add a culvert to the creek instead of creating a bridge on the road. unless there really is a bridge.

there is no need to add the number of lanes to the road name. the lanes=4 tag already covers this. thanks!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134635084

are the marked ford=yes nodes actually fords? the NHD flowlines around the Sierras are not super accurate, and most (say 95-99%) of the notable ones have culverts or bridges
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134434061

grocery stores need not be added to hiking routes, even if they are nearby. take a look at osm.wiki/Hiking#Roles for common hiking relation roles.

No worries, just saw these pop up in Osmose. can you take a look and connect or delete them? There may be others too: osm.org/way/924857015 osm.org/way/924857036 osm.org/way/924857009 osm.org/way/924857033
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132234287

this change deleted a lot of tracks and left some orphaned/disconnected. was this intentional?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132234287

I double checked in Secor and the UTM location can point to either one but the description makes it sound like the way you have it mapped is correct:

"The south side of the pass consists of slabs that lead to the northern base of Matthes Crest."

Secor describes Wilts Col as being directly between peak 7 and 8, where Echo Pass (currently) located. do you think Wilts Col and Echo Pass are one and the same?

should be fixed by osm.org/changeset/129662865#map=15/37.8349/-119.8433