OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
138166004 about 2 years ago

why do you believe this road to be a secondary? you've upgraded it from unclassified, to tertiary, to secondary?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138166004

138165711 about 2 years ago

old proposed roads and fully destroyed roads don’t belong here, please remove them and add them to https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ (or some other site) instead
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138165711

137616362 about 2 years ago

this used to be an old trail that was still serviceable as a use trail.. has it been destroyed in recent times?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137616362

137213677 about 2 years ago

please use better statewide references before upgrading all of the road tags, Tioga Pass Road for example is secondary
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137213677

136520705 about 2 years ago

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=12&lat=37.3207&lon=-119.1773 can also help highlight problems in the map

136520705 about 2 years ago

these are not link roads nor secondary, please read osm.wiki/Highway_link and osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified

134756633 over 2 years ago

trail updates around the GTW and eastern Sequoia, added bridge details, Volcano Falls and a few more buildings

134635084 over 2 years ago

if it's a name that would be used on an mailing address then `name` is fine... otherwise I'd use `loc_name` or maybe `alt_name` depending on how common it is. just something like `loc_name=The Four Lane` without quotes should be good. the road number is pulled from the `ref` tag so you don't need to add it again

134635084 over 2 years ago

when a creek runs under a road add a culvert to the creek instead of creating a bridge on the road. unless there really is a bridge.

there is no need to add the number of lanes to the road name. the lanes=4 tag already covers this. thanks!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134635084

134434061 over 2 years ago

are the marked ford=yes nodes actually fords? the NHD flowlines around the Sierras are not super accurate, and most (say 95-99%) of the notable ones have culverts or bridges
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134434061

133652920 over 2 years ago

grocery stores need not be added to hiking routes, even if they are nearby. take a look at osm.wiki/Hiking#Roles for common hiking relation roles.

132234287 over 2 years ago

No worries, just saw these pop up in Osmose. can you take a look and connect or delete them? There may be others too: osm.org/way/924857015 osm.org/way/924857036 osm.org/way/924857009 osm.org/way/924857033
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132234287

132234287 over 2 years ago

this change deleted a lot of tracks and left some orphaned/disconnected. was this intentional?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132234287

129174409 over 2 years ago

I double checked in Secor and the UTM location can point to either one but the description makes it sound like the way you have it mapped is correct:

"The south side of the pass consists of slabs that lead to the northern base of Matthes Crest."

129174409 over 2 years ago

Secor describes Wilts Col as being directly between peak 7 and 8, where Echo Pass (currently) located. do you think Wilts Col and Echo Pass are one and the same?

126157758 over 2 years ago

should be fixed by osm.org/changeset/129662865#map=15/37.8349/-119.8433

126157758 over 2 years ago

this broke the Yosemite Wilderness relation
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126157758

128953724 almost 3 years ago

did you also modify the existing canyon?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128953724

126795363 almost 3 years ago

minor nit but consider adding bridge=boardwalk for the boardwalk osm.wiki/Tag:bridge%3Dboardwalk
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126795363

124463048 about 3 years ago

the problem in this area is mostly due to NHD flowlines imported as waterways. many (most?) of these should be deleted but it's a ton of work to clean up an area. Yosemite is much better than Inyo NF in this regard.

the 1994 USGS quads are a better reference for waterways, they're not always correct but they're pretty good. in this case there is no waterway on the USGS quad. the trail however does get wet... just no running or standing water to deal with, at least in my experience.