Could I politely ask what you intended by the 2 instances of "bollard=no" in this changeset? Is it a bollard, or is it not a bollard?

Thanks for pointing out my typo.
This has already been corrected (moop --> moped), in Changeset: 80030065
moop -> moped
Closed about 2 hours ago by mueschel

Thanks for correcting my typo (moop)

Correction: im my first comment, I should have said "the Western half is a building".
Thanks for accepting my suggestions. I will update accordingly.

See:
https://campbellarchitects.co.uk/project/russell-way-crawley/ for details of flats "next to railway line", so on the South side of Russell Way.

I visited this site (Russel Way) today. IMHO the Eastern Half is still brownfield and not grass. There is a sign up saying that the site has been acquired, so re-development looks likely. The eastern half is a building whose purpose was hard to determine from the road. Could be flats, but didn't look quite right.

Thank you very much for drawing my attention to this error. I have now been on a trip along what used to be the A5130 and can confirm that it no longer has a Ref No. I will downgrade it to tertiary and remove the Ref (or change it to Old_Ref, as I see that some other sections have been). There are a few instances of "A5130" painted on the road surface at roundabouts, but they are very feint. My Satnav told me that I was on the A5130, but that just shows that TomTom mapping is also our of date.
Thanks again
Peter

This is obviously a huge changeset - and created some time ago - so you might not remember the detail. However (if I have consulted the history and changeset correctly) it includes a number of instances (e.g. osm.org/way/205996585) where you have tagged a road flare approaching a roundabout with "junction=approach". I can find no documentation in the wiki for this tagging and iD raises it as an issue, saying that "Junction=approach" should be a closed way (i.e.a 2-D object, or area). Could you explain why you tagged it this way? What did you mean by the tag? Is it still relevant?

Thanks,
Peter

Thank for your helpful comment. Yes, I'll try to get down there in the next few days and check again what the signage says. From memory, I'm pretty certain that it is signed in Black lettering on a White background (which means Primary route, but NOT a Trunk Route, doesn't it?). I may need to read the Wiki again to check how to tag it correctly. I also think that the A5130 follows Newport Road, then Fen Street, then Newport Road again. Also,you may notice that Fen Street heads off East, turns South, but then has a gap in it; I think the intention may be to fill the gap in and then route the A5130 along that to join the A421, once they have finished dualling the section down to M1 J13. It is an area that I will have to keep an eye on.

OK Thanks. In that case, I'll delete the railway crossing.

I am not clear why you have created a Railway crossing (foot) at the end of Manor Close. AFAIK there is no railway near here.

Thanks @rskedgell. I have added the commas and used the tool to check it. Thanks for your help.

I can confirm that the store in Milton Keynes (180010538) is now open, branded as Homebase. Hope this helps, but I acknowledge that this is not the preferred method of verifying changes.

Sorry! I pressed Update too quickly!!
Description should say, "Moved Kents Hill Primary School to correct location. Created construction site for Kents Hill Primary School." Source: Consultation document for Kents Hill Primary and Secondary Schools.

Hi Mike,
If I delete the names (in the case of footbridges) and revert to the road names (for roads), how do I make the Bridge Ref display on the standard view of the map, please?
I only started adding / changing the names to get them to display and to give consistency after I saw some with no name, one named "GUnn" another named "Bridge nn" etc.

Regards
Peter

Thanks for your comments @mapping man. I have added the name "Oak" again.

OK. Sorry if I have contravened a convention. I tagged it with the name "Oak" because is is a very prominent, old Oak tree, possibly verging on "Landmark" status. The house facing it is named "Oak View", so I thought it might be appropriate. In response to your comment, I have removed the Name tag.

Correction: This is the North-West Corner of the car park (not the North-East!)

Just looked at it again and realised the error was that, although it IS one-way, it should be Eastbound, not Westbound, as it originally was. I will amend again.

I added this small section of Tongwell Street because, in the Edit view, there was a gap. On looking again at the standard map, there was no gap, so I have duplicated this section of trunk road. I will try to delete it again.
PeterPan99