Hi Tinkerbell, many thanks for contributing to OSM, but it seems like many of your fictional edits are not in line with the guidelines for Pokemon Go mapping which clearly state to only map what you see on the ground:

> do map things that exist on the ground. The map is used by pedestrians, people with disabilities, cyclists, hikers, canoeists, drivers and others. Do not add things -such as footways- that do not exist
> do add things you see (i.e. benches, cafes, fire hydrants, bicycle parking spots) or things you know (if your favorite cafe offers free wifi, the type of cuisine of the nearby diner, accessibility, opening hours, official websites, wikipedia links)

By taking a bit of effort to find real features to map in your neighborhood, you can both create a more detailed map for everyone to use as well as improve your gaming experience.

Happy to help in case you have any questions.
Cheers.

In India, the convention is to use trunk for National Highways. Is it ok to retag them?

This map data is also used by several application that navigate bikers, and such a change would cause them not to be routed on this trail. It would be great if you can make the correction.

It may not be too hard to find actual footpaths/sidewalks that are missing on the map, you should add them.

Thanks, found it on https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/49909095/

osm.wiki/Addresses

Tubk86 thank you for your edits. It looks like you may need to fix the tags on all your address points. Please see the OSM wiki on how to add addresses.

If you continue adding this data with wrong tags, your contributions might have to be removed.

According to http://i93exit4a.com/ this exit is proposed. I'm reverting this change.

Thank you for the edit. Is this motorway link really there?

Why was the cycleway deleted?

Noticed that you removed the Stadium, has it been demolished?

Not sure if this change is needed since the trail seems to be primarily a bike trail that can also be used for walking.

The original tagging of `highway=cycleway` and `foot=yes` seems to be correct.

Thank you for your contributions. What is your source for the power lines? They don't seem to be visible in the satellite imagery.

Are all of the places actually cities? Town seems more appropriate for a place <100,000 inhabitants.

Why is this a secondary road? Retagging it as a residential which seems more appropriate.

Hi Jem, you have once again downgraded a national highway which should be a `trunk` road to a primary road. Can you please explain your reason to do this?

Awesome, thanks for adding these!

Thank you for taking the effort to improve this!

Thanks for your edits! noticed that you tagged Ellenton as a city which is incorrect, have fixed this :)

Many of these roads do not look like access controlled motorways, they should likely be trunk or primary depending on the local classification

Thanks for adding the building heights! Were they supposed to be in metres? A height of 504m for a 25 floor building seems incorrect https://publicmap.github.io/#15.17/18.9851/72.8276/9.6/60