PlaneMad's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
72338458 | over 5 years ago | Whoops, fixed! |
82794096 | over 5 years ago | Hi looks like you may have accidentally tagged whole of IIT campus to a park. Correcting it. |
62176225 | over 5 years ago | Hi, super work mapping Khorda! |
76992071 | over 5 years ago | Its been over 24 hours with the boundary relations not have been updated consistently across levels. Have reverted the change for now osm.org/changeset/77083852
|
76992071 | over 5 years ago | The tiles have still not updated to the changed data upto z12. After z13 you can see the tiles reflect the updates made in this changeset. Like you said, the data that was present was correct as per the OSMF guidelines on representing disputed territories, there was nothing to update unless there was some change on the ground regarding the control of the territory. |
76992071 | over 5 years ago | This changeset changed the Kalapani disputed territory to be within the Nepal relation from the de-facto situation of being within the India relation as per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalapani_territory The Nepalese claim line should exist just like the Indian claim lines on parts of Kashmir controlled by Pakistan and China osm.org/relation/4610574 There has been recent media focus on this dispute which could be causing more people to look into this disputed area from both countries. |
76992071 | over 5 years ago | Hi Ro Sun, given that disputed boundaries are always an emotional issue between countries, i urge you to take a look at the OSMF policy regarding mapping these in a neutral way: https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf To my knowledge all sources indicate the territory is occupied by the ITBP since 1962. If you have any source of info that the area is under control of Nepal government, please document the link here, since a few more relations of subnational boundaries need updating as well. If you are looking to create render a map that follows official Nepal maps, you might have to generate your own tile like what was done for India: osm.org/user/azaadshatru/diary/390300 |
76832698 | over 5 years ago | Thanks for adding the corridor but NH703AA is for the road starting from Kapurthala connecting Goindwal Sahib and terminating near Taran Taran http://ddnews.gov.in/national/nh-no-703aa-punjab-named-guru-nanak-dev-ji-marg-gadkari Making this correction to the road. |
73617781 | almost 6 years ago | Fantastic work mapping Sakti. Looks beautiful! |
68034492 | almost 6 years ago | Many thanks for a lot of the mapping in the area. While doing some cleanup, i merged the different sections of Rambagh Flyover and also removed many duplicated turn restriction relations that did not seem necessary. From online reports it looks like the flyover is completely open, but maybe i could be wrong. If you have more info, please do check and make corrections if needed. |
51699939 | almost 6 years ago | Have updated the tag to barrier:personnel which is more appropriate. |
51697744 | almost 6 years ago | Hi Vineet, many thanks for mapping stores around IITB. Just made a bunch of updates including correcting the department_store tag to convenience which better descibes the small stores that are there. |
9703590 | about 6 years ago | Cann you share the map link of the location? i can see updated tiles on my end. |
71342991 | about 6 years ago | Nice work mapping Nagpur. Ive corrected some roads mistakenly tagged as a motorway. |
9703590 | about 6 years ago | Check in a private tab? you might be ssing cached tiles. |
9703590 | about 6 years ago | You are right, this was traced long back with low resolution landsat imagery which looked like a wetland but are just very well irrigated farmlands. Updating it now, thanks. |
34943829 | about 6 years ago | Amazing work with the survey and mapping around Sabarimala. Have made some more updates and corrections, please check. |
68028339 | over 6 years ago | These were farmlands in the river valley that was added incorrectly as a wetland by me 6 years ago using landsat imagery. |
63977851 | over 6 years ago | Got it, seems like a lot of tracks i've tagged as sidings in the past should actually be service=yard. Thanks, will keep this in mind in future. |
63977851 | over 6 years ago | Just looked at the wiki, it doesnt look like platform lines are considered to be tagged as siding. Looking elsewhere like UK and Germany, all platform lines are tagged like mainlines osm.org/#map=18/52.47784/-1.89881 |