Hello Philippec,

For this one : osm.org/node/4065313123

The park has been refurbished and it’s no more the same drinking water location and model : see https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=225700460360829
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=318528810874570

Can you fix oldest images with currents one ?

Have a good day,
Raphaël

Fixed for Vleesgracht (name and position (it's a culvert)

btw osm.org/way/1233514967 has a culvert part too (according to Urbis latest imagery and official wms data)

I don't find information for visbeek (the name) can you share your source ?

I listen the argument to promote discussion to tag this as picnic_table but :

- Most of other Havel's Place are tagued as bench , some artwork or memorial , i didn't find any picnic.
- Wiki is clear : "Use leisure=picnic_table, if it is a picnic_table and only a picnic_table." see osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpicnic_table
- As data user of this poi when i travel , i expect (as many others) to find a place to picnic, meaning eating , drinking and have a little place to prepare ; here it's not the case at all ; imagine a family searching a place and find 2 benchs ...

For the technical problem (the base on osm : one object one taging scheme) what's the reason of changing the v1 ? For me it was perfectly mapped , no reason to include more error in the database ; i suggest to restore to v1.

Have a nice day.

Hello, Can you explain where you see dog=no ?
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=202430272224313
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=199851929145752

Hello,

No exception for bicycle ? asking because you have a cycle route here osm.org/relation/35053 and your changeset broke the routing.

if there's exception you must add : oneway:bicycle=no

Have a nice day.

For the building that don't appear , OsmGo hide by default polygons larger than 5000 m² if you uncheck this it will show on map (i recomand you to uncheck also the other default hiding) and check Make polygons selectable.

For changeset comments see : osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

vandalism reverted : osm.org/changeset/144369720

Hello,

Can you have a second look on this : osm.org/way/1211559733 ; the service road cross a hedge and a bus plateform.

Also in Bxl it's better to use Urbis aerial imagery than bing.

Have a good day.

Hello,

Thank's for your reply. I have surveyed the place yesterday , and the C11 are still present. (as repeated signal because you have C3 on all main entrances.

It's true that from Promenade du Chemin de fer there's no more signs (but the pole is still present , look's like was vandalised) : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=617947203875184

But in the Règlement de police concernant l'usage et l'occupation des parcs, espaces verts et
aires de jeux situés sur le domaine public de la commune de Woluwe-Saint-Lambert on Article 6.2 it's stipulate that it's not allowed : 6.2 circuler à bicyclette, trottinette, planches à roulettes, patins à roulettes etc... en dehors
des pistes cyclables, des chemins et des sentiers en dur.

The area and the ground path there are not "sentiers en dur". It's also stipulate on the "Règlement général de Police : "Article 82
Les véhicules non motorisés, les cycles, les trottinettes, les planches à roulettes, les skis à roulettes, et
les patins à roulettes sont interdits dans les espaces verts à l'exception des voitures d'enfants et de
personnes moins valides, ainsi que des cycles conduits par des enfants de moins de 11 ans et dans la
mesure où leur conduite ne met pas en danger la sécurité des autres usagers.
Les cycles, les trottinettes, les planches à roulettes et les patins à roulettes peuvent être utilisés aux
endroits spécifiquement destinés à cet effet.

There is no indincation that it's a mtb park and not stipulated that cycling is allowed there.

I understand that the place is used in fact but that's don't make it a playground and cycleway inside. (btw mtb mapping use track or path not cycleway) I suggest to use disused:highway=path with access=no for the ways and the prefix not: for the area. With leaving a note to prevent other mapper to redraw (better to not delete it).

Have a good day.

Hello,

Where this "Mountainbike" came from ? I'm little surpirse because the Parc is protected and access on this part is forbitten for bicycle :

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=7715844891821116

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=813807902949128

Hello Philippe,

Par exemple les Proxy Delhaize qui ne sont pas des Delhaize ni de nom ni de Brand, c'est ce qui m'a sauté aux yeux directement ; il doit en avoir d'autres mais vu la taille du changeset ça va prendre du temps à tout contrôler.

Un belle journée,
Raphaël

Hello,

Can you please be kind and give the source of the name of building ?

Asking because there's already Magyar Ház on the map on other location and at present time (passed there last week) the building is in major renovation.

I know that the Hungarian gouvernement buy the building but the only information that was given to the press was the building will be use on second semester of 2024 for the european presidency and maybe will become after a cultural center. They don't mention any name for the building.
IMHO it's to early to put a name on a building as there's no clearly source indicated this.

Have you more information to share ?

Have a nice day.

Hello,

No clearly a inattention mistake. Thanks for the fix.

Hello,

You have put the length of the 7L/25R on 7R/25L. Correct data is 3 211 meter not 3 638. That being said ft should be writen <feet>'<inch>" not ft. (see osm.wiki/Map_features/Units)

On another airports in Belgium, local mapper use meter as it's published like this in AIP. That prevend conversion error. EBBR is an exception and we have a mix and some "yoyo" on units in changesets history. I think it's better to keep this coherent and put units in meter.

Also you put incorrect length here : osm.org/way/517469023

Can you fix this ?

Have a nice day.

Hello,

Please read : osm.wiki/Multilingual_names#Brussels

We have to revert your changenset.

Avec plaisir ;-) Curiosité ici : les escaliers (à mapper) menant à la plateforme 5;6 sont munis d'une rampe vélo mais il est interdit d'embarquer des vélos à Chapelle ! #belgiansolutions.

Hello,

Because it's not the good building as i mentioned in my changeset link to this note : osm.org/note/3521247

This building or the previous one is not Bloc Dubreucq or Aile de l’Horloge at all : it's a mistake you introduce , please read links on note 3521247. Can you also provide me the source you use to make the name on the incorrect buildding ? Asking that because it's look like you misunderstand the heritage.brussels documentation and behind that , it's a copyright violation (you must provide the source at least on changeset comment if you use this website)

Aile de l'horloge was part of this building osm.org/way/260917455 and as i mentioned on my changeset comment it's difficult to find the original outline as there's only left the facade.

Hello,

A court saying there is no fence and no gate ? Reality indicate there is , and i make this to help people visualise theres is no access here.

It's a little trivial no ?

Have a nice sunny day.

Hello,

OSM data model don't reflect a legal status but a reality status.

Best regards,

Hello,

What is not correct here please ? I have consulted all the history and also CadgisWeb (public space) , IGN indicate there is a path, add a bollard to clearly indicated it's blocked by someone (using recent streetlevel imagery and also other older pictures) add it's a desire (see wiki) and set as private to prevent any navigation problem. The path exist and it's no more accessible, it's exactly what my changeset indicate. I have also add barrier and fence to clearly indicate the reality.

So i will do no revert.

Have a nice day.