Oops, I changed them to `ref:GB:decc`, not `reg:GB:decc`.

The footpath osm.org/way/1074497315 was removed a couple of months ago as part of the park rejuvenation scheme, so I've removed it again 👍

Once again, thank you for the edits, but please don't edit the landuse like that. Mapping landuse to the pavement border is standard landuse practice.

Thank you! I must have deleted it accidentally 🤦‍♂️

Thank you for the much-needed changes to the cycling infrastructure :)

The landuse changes aren't ideal though, mapping landuse to the pavement edges is a fairly standard practice for micromapping, so I've reverted those to how they were before.

Although this edit wasn't perfect, many thanks for all your road/transport/cycling work across London :)

Ah good catch! I've updated the tagging to correctly mark it as contraflow :)

Fixed in this changeset:
osm.org/changeset/121280785

ah, it's a MapRoulette task. They shouldn't be removed, but retagged as `area:aeroway=runway`

Why was this removed?

The protected_class tags are all fixed now, thank you for your contributions so far :)

Thank you for the detailed mapping!

One suggestion, it's better to create a large building area containing house extensions, then you can add osm.org/wiki/building:part for each of the different parts :)

this type of mapping is part of Simple 3D Buildings, which may be interesting to look at: osm.wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings

oops, more like 300m, I'm bad at distance estimation 😅

I've lived my entire life in Blackheath, less than 100m away from this, and I've never heard it called 'Cowboy Land'. Are there any sources for this being the name?

wow that was fast, thanks 👍

Hi,
These conversions from footway to path are not correct, and will be reverted.

Thank you for your additions :) just wanted to say that for parking, you should use an area with `amenity=parking` instead of `parking_aisle`

Wait, I'm entirely misremembering this, there is no north-south path 😅 for sure you can remove it, thank you :)

Hi! As far as I know, it was the path going north-south that was removed, not the one going east-west. Unfortunately, I can't survey it as I'm at uni :(

If it was for sure the east-west path, then definitely feel free to remove it 👍

ah you're right, sorry about that. i'll revert the removal 👍

Hi hthack, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions so far! :)

congrats on the first changeset of 2022!