see osm.org/relation/19328507 for a "finished" example, I was just planning on only having route relations for the signed portions of the CRs. Also, I think the conclusion was reached that route relations don't need a name if they have a signed ref

So the reason I've been deleting the Weld CR Relations is that the vast majority of them are not signed with pentagons (as opposed to Larimer), and the relation doesn't give any more information than is given in the name tag. I tried to do a "signed/unsigned" distinction similar to how US 85 is, but that just didn't work very well

also thank you!

Last time I looked most of the letters had peeled off, it was more substantial 11 years ago

Don't know, just copied the label that was on it

In my defense I don't think that tag existed 11 years ago (or I didn't look then)

Hey, it looks like this could have been re-tagged with a better tagging scheme instead of deleted (osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpublic_bookcase). Could this be reverted please?

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mountain-west-automated-road-route-road-name-changes/132498

Please join!

This made duplicates in Weld County of Morgan County routes... automation might not be the best way forward here

Why were the name tags removed? They are part of the address for the road and signed as such.

just FYI

I think this made a bunch of duplicate road relations

not that many of them, I can get to them this week

unfortunately my forefathers did not take duplication across state lines into account

FYI this pulled in a number of SD township wikidata links, am going through individually and linking the right ones

I have name:left and name:right on some of the others as well (was moving too quickly for these and forgot). I'll post something in the forum and see what people think. I'm fine with whatever, just want the best way to do it.

see osm.org/way/1120136215, osm.org/way/14065864 for other examples