SHARCRASH's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by SHARCRASH
Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3864789 | Mateusz Konieczny |
shop=tankshop ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from osm.wiki/Key:shop fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else? |
|||
4065302 | Kugelbaum | In context of "Surfaces" overlay for osm.org/way/442601617 via StreetComplete 56.0: Grass patch only, way around. Attached photo(s):
|
|||
3202151 | joost schouppe | There's a parking mapped here, but the access road has a traffic sign prohibiting all vehicles. Is it really a parking then? |
|||
3900550 | SHARCRASH | On this changeset, www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141544204 the contributor deleted a portion of the path www.openstreetmap.org/way/570062336 connecting here www.openstreetmap.org/node/7640352996 There is a hiking guide post though near this node suggesting directions to hikers, one being a passage between 2 parallel barriers and house 23 and 21 . It's possible that the guide post and the passage do not exist anymore, or changed intersection, or this contributor does not realise that grass growing on field is "natural" and therefore the trail disappears because not many people pass, yet the path is still usable. The tag "trail_visibility= * " exists to express this situation. By my experience, this contributor also deleted/altered existing elements in my local area but was difficult to communicate with, claiming only subjective point of views instead of objectivity of the elements, so IMO, another contributor being on location should review this. Thanks! |
|||
1931621 | SHARCRASH | Too many ways are inaccurate in position, unconnected crossings and confused between path and track. Not easy for orientation! |
|||
3217023 | Nino Van Brussels | Due to the work for tram the road is closed |
|||
4049463 | Plav | Walked here 28 December 2023 and did not notice the embankments on north and south of this path. Do they actually exist? Otherwise, they should be deleted from the map. |
|||
4011864 | Kugelbaum | In context of "Surfaces" overlay for osm.org/way/463355934 via StreetComplete 55.1: No path visible. Attached photo(s):
|
|||
1547568 | TobyMG | Not visited in person, but it doesn't look like these are cycleways. If they are MTB tracks a different tagging (or more detail on surface) is probably appropriate. |
|||
3893432 | BeerselMapper | Zitbank |