Hi and welcome to OSM. Please don't add English names in non English
speaking countries except where there is a community consensus to do so. If there us a widely used English name you can add that to the name:en tag. Thanks
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62202965

Hi and welcome to OSM. I noticed that you deleted a node marking some historic ruins in your edits, was that really intentional? See osm.org/node/278472729/history
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62194473

I've reverted the place name change for now in osm.org/changeset/62182140#map=19/43.14667/-88.30676

Hi and welcome to OSM. You've changed a name of a place, is there a specific source or reason for this change?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62168489

Hi and welcome to OSM, a further question: is the town simply planned or what is its status?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62158981

Hi and welcome to OSM.

You changed a place node name from "Merton" to "Not Merton", that is unlikely to be the correct name. If the place doesn't actually exist you should simply delete the node in question. If there is another problem we can surely get to the bottom of it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62154483

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/61870315

Further question: do you have opening hours information? That would clearly be useful to add.

Hi the duplication of objects is not tragic, but should be cleaned up. I think we can assume that the information added itself is ok, so the cleanup would simply involve merging the additional data in to the original object and then removing the added object (naturally only in cases where the library was already present).

Hallo bjc

Bei diesem und anderen changesets gibts du "geodienste.ch" als Quelle an. Wenn es auch Datensätze auf geodienste.ch gibt die wir tatsächlich nutzen können (z..B. Kanton Wallis), ist es nicht generell so. Kannst du bitte generell bessere Angaben zum verwendeten Datensatz machen, und bei Unklarheiten dich and die talk-ch Liste wenden.

Ansonsten gibt es für den Kanton Bern durchaus Datensätze die wir nutzen dürfen, die beziehen wir aber direkt vom Kanton, siehe osm.wiki/Canton_of_Bern_Address_Import und osm.wiki/Switzerland/Datasources#Compliant_sources_from_Cantons

Danke

I've removed the trail names (after reverting the two changesets) and added access=private to the paths in question.

BUT the ways were part of the route relations Alpe-Adria-Trail and Soška Pot from which I've removed them too. Both the routes seem to be broken (which is however seems to have been the case before) and should be fixed by somebody with the requisite knowledge.

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/61261474#map=17/46.37803/13.74660&layers=NG

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/61261474#map=17/46.37803/13.74660&layers=NG

@freebeer & @quark21 bitte das nächste Mal einen Nazi nicht einfach weitermachen lassen sondern der DWG melden (hab jetzt hoffentlich den Rest des Vandalismus behoben).

Hallo simmet und willkommen bei OSM.

Eine Frage zu dieser Änderung und den vorhergehenden: was hast du genau bei map.geo.admin.ch übernommen? Mit wenigen Ausnahmen (auf die wir aber anders Zugriff haben) ist nichts auf map.geo.admin.ch eine legitime Quelle für OSM.

Gruss

Removed in osm.org/changeset/60211528

As there has been no reaction from Tim_HH, I'm deleting the way. If the circuit remains definitely (currently seems unlikely) it can be modelled as a route.

Hallo swift6104

Bitte füge die Standplätze der Boot nicht zu den Seerelationen hinzu. Die Standplätze selbst sind schon genug kontrovers, sie noch zu den Seeumrissen hinzuzufügen ist auch sachlich nicht gerechtfertigt.

Danke

Upps, this included a minor landuse improvement on Crete.

Hallo nurdafür, kannst du mal den Edit von osm.org/node/3209930698 überprüfen? Da scheint das Wasser jetzt bergauf zu laufen, Zufälligerweise vorhin gesehen.

Gruss