SomeoneElse's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
166109780 | 2 months ago | Looks like spam to me |
166588431 | 2 months ago | osm.org/node/12825008634/history looks like spam to me :) |
166647833 | 2 months ago | In here I've changed the Dales High Way route up Shipley Glen - osm.org/relation/7152429#map=16/53.85060/-1.80649 . The previous route may once have existed, but peters out north of osm.org/way/1388968997 which is a bit of a scramble back up. |
165091458 | 2 months ago | Thanks! |
166516019 | 2 months ago | Hello,
|
165909049 | 2 months ago | Oops - somehow "utility=gas; marker=pedestal" got added to the (unfortunately closed) Aldwark Arms. Maybe a preset accidentially got added in Vespucci? :) |
166217758 | 3 months ago | Re your comment above "... let's raise it on the tagging list or the relevant proposal thread to get broader community input", for the avoidance of doubt in the comment that you replied to I already said "... something that I mentioned in the forum". For completeness, that post is: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/aligning-osm-hiking-sections-with-wikivoyage/129850/44 . |
166217758 | 3 months ago | Another option (something that I mentioned in the forum) would be to use a different map in the wikivoyage articles. The one currently on https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Pennine_Way is basically a road map and really not useful at any level of detail. |
166280406 | 3 months ago | Привіт, KKS,
|
166280406 | 3 months ago | Hello KKS,
|
166160436 | 3 months ago | ¡Hola y bienvenido a OpenStreetMap!
|
166160436 | 3 months ago | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
|
54163580 | 3 months ago | No idea, I've never been there - I just added the underscore! |
166150894 | 3 months ago | For info, two accounts were working together here. I've reverted the other one in osm.org/changeset/166163077 and have forced through the remaining reverts in osm.org/changeset/166163147 |
166126842 | 3 months ago | ts1877a and ts1878b.
|
36491506 | 3 months ago | osm.org/relation/5848094/history has been a "place=locality" since basically forever, but I don't think that that is correct, is it? |
166025400 | 3 months ago | Also - if you have changed any other examples in this way those will be wrong too. Please investigate each one and correct if necessary. There were 10 a couple of weeks ago: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/23Ty . |
166025400 | 3 months ago | This clearly isn't correct. "Just Tyres" sells (as the name implies) "Just Tyres".
|
166065512 | 3 months ago | Somewhat confusingly, the service road osm.org/way/733298699 was part of the Clwydian Hills relation osm.org/relation/10757713 and extending it meant that that boundary was no longer a valid polygon. I've cut it in too and removed the end part from the relation in osm.org/changeset/166101884; the boundary should reappar now. |
166085279 | 3 months ago | Thanks!
|