Hello,
osm.org/node/12784056908#map=20/56.4591569/-2.9774313 has both disused:amenity and healthcare tags - I guess it needs adjusting one way or the others?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hi,
If this is open again I guess that the "disused:amenity=dentist" tag can go?
Cheers,
Andy

Hello,
If this is no longer a dentist then I guess the healthcare=dentist tag should also be removed?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello, in this changeset https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/237206161 had "public_transport=platform" added, but according to the note it's out of use?
Best Regards,
Andy

For info, you might be interested in the forum topic https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/maxweight-meaning-and-maxweightrating/132190/1 .

Thanks!

Hello, and welcome to OSM!
When you say you "checked on construction* did you actually viait or have personal knowledge of this localation?
Aerial (and streetside) imagery will not be helpful for finding out what the current state of construction is - it is by definition out of date.
Best Regards,
Andy

Burley in Wharfdale, from survey 15/06/2025, ts1994b

Thanks!

Hello tomyak,
Please do use more descriptive changeset comments than just "updated" - it really will help other mappers to help you!
Best Regards,
Andy

?

Hello,
"Fareham Street" here has had "ford=yes" set here: https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/1164013794 . I'm guessing that that was a mistake and some other tag was made?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
The iD editor's brand suggestions are just that - suggestions.
Please don't apply them in places that you are not familiar with Quite a lot of the suggestions for brands have incorrect geographical areas or are just rubbish. The onus is always on the person accepting the suggestion to verify that it is correct
Best Regards,
Andy

User is blocked now for other reasons osm.org/user_blocks/18371 , DWG ticket 2025062010000323 .

Hello,
osm.org/way/1396460767 was newly added in here, and looks like it should be added to the western bit of the C2C.
When adding new ways via Vespucci I don't know of an easy way to check what relations they "Should have been part of", so I tend to review for gaps when back at home.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
You've deleted a few houses here - are they no longer standing?
Best Regards,
Andy

Wenn osm.org/way/1384003260/history auf einer Karte über anderen Merkmalen angezeigt würde, obwohl es sich unterirdisch befindet, würde ich die Verwendung einer anderen Karte vorschlagen!

If osm.org/way/1384003260/history was shown on a map above other features despite being underground I'd suggest using a different map!

Thanks for that!
Does that mean that the ways that are part of osm.org/relation/13113383 could perhaps be moved to osm.org/relation/31640 ?
There are a few other NCN routes that have several pieces like this (not for reasons of length), but I suspect that someone might consolidate them at some point.
The milepost (if it doesn't get moved) won't be the only one that's no longer 100% accurate after route moving / renaming!

Hello,
Just wondered - is osm.org/relation/13113383#map=16/51.80928/-0.03301 part of osm.org/relation/31640#map=16/51.80928/-0.03301 (or does the main route continue along the canal, past the NCN milepost osm.org/node/160080113 )?
Best Regards,
Andy