The newly added footpaths here such as osm.org/way/356627173 seem to be more of a "tube map" - topologically correct, but don't match the imagery. Needs a ground survey.

The area round here needs a proper ground survey - lots of features have been questionably added based on over-enthusiastic interpretation of aerial imagery.

My recollection (based upon walking osm.org/way/188987402 ) was that it can get a bit muddy here which might explain some of the variability.

osm.org/way/206770942 has been "armchaired" and probably does not exist. I certainly didn't notice it.

osm.org/way/356627174 does not exist as mapped (it runs through what looks like a sewage farm). It also crosses the main road without joining it.

Please don't "armchair" map this to fix errors reported on a QA site - it needs a proper survey to see what actually exists and what does not. Additionally, QA site errors are useful to indicate areas needing proper a survey.

Check the phone masts etc. here.
The EE one osm.org/node/10085838209 still exists.
There's one by the "communications_transponder" osm.org/node/5587204812 .
I don't believe that there is an O2 one by the new car park osm.org/node/10085838208 .
Has the O2 one moved north, and is the "communications_transponder" something different?

The river here osm.org/relation/420985#map=18/42.58534/-83.23604 is an 8-year old import in OSM. It looks like it was substantially remodelled following the building of the offices here - needs a survey (just looking over the edge of the various roads it crosses would be a start).
Cheers,
Andy

I'm pretty sure that the name of osm.org/way/355372445 isn't "Stiperstones" - it's longer than that (containing "Nature Reserve" or something). Needs survey to check.