OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

SomeoneElse's Notes

Notes submitted or commented on by SomeoneElse

Id Creator Description Created at Last changed
31392 SomeoneElse

Part of the National Byway runs through here, and I _thought_ that the signs said "byway" rather than "loop" - but is the actually part of the Grantham Loop rather than the main route?

14429 SomeoneElse

There's a stile here, but should it be at the end of the path from the northeast, or on both paths?

10880 SomeoneElse

Survey needed. This bridleway doesn't join at either end, doesn't always match the imagery and appears to be a combination of bridleways and tracks from the imagery where it does match.

9241 SomeoneElse

More GPS traces needed here to confirm offset in the Bing imagery which has been traced here.

9215 SomeoneElse

I'm not convinced that what's mapped here matches my recollection of reality. Needs survey.

Ideally one way should represent the long ford (i.e both the road and the stream).

Should the long ford also extend as far south as the southern ford, as mapped now? I suspect not.

My recollection is that a pedestrian wouldn't get their feet wet - as mapped now, they would.

9189 SomeoneElse

As mapped, the separate footpaths here suggests that you can walk along the footpath but never actually join the road. Perhaps it would be better to use sidewalk=left/right as appropriate?

9187 SomeoneElse

Based on the GPS traces on the main road and the unclassified road to the west, the Bing imagery here is offset.

Unfortunately OSM here matches the imagery rather than the reality.

8638 SomeoneElse

I'm guessing that this bridleway (a) joins at the south end and (b) goes somewhere from the north end. Survey needed?

360339 SomeoneElse

osm.org/way/331041856 needs a proper survey - it doesn't join at each end and doesn't match the imagery.

2122943 DithyWin

Cars are trying to use this lane to access the golf centre (and getting stuck). This is in terms of rights of way, a footpath, so is not suitable for any vehicle.