Sorry for lack of clarity.
The features deleted were members of administrative boundary relations like osm.org/relation/16736466#map=13/23.07025/72.63725
osm.wiki/Tag:boundary=administrative?uselang=en

Most of your changes have been reverted.
Please only add real names and features.
osm.wiki/Vandalism
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161080745

161080745 161080733 161080711 161080698 161080682 161080669 161080659 161080636 161080629 161080601 161080580 161080565 161080550
161080540 161080529 161080522 161080508 161080490 161080471 161080457 161080442 161080404 161080298 161080202 161080136 161078856
161078798 161078573 161078384 161078251 161078160 161078068 161078032 161077985 161077963 161074666 161074603 161074173 161073896
161073542 161073083 161073033

Why was the road direction reversed?

reverted. Please don't delete features you don't understand

osm.org/changeset/161066336

reverted. Please don't delete features you don't understand

osm.org/changeset/161066336

This was the subject of a block from 5 months ago. Please read it.
Google is not allowed as a source.
osm.org/user_blocks/16499

Welcome to OSM!
Name should be left blank in this case.
osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Hello
Why was this ramp tagged as a path?
osm.org/way/38176253
Is the ramp being demolished?
osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

idk

Access=private tag was added in osm.org/changeset/105234265
See https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/250656452

This changeset left impossible oneway at osm.org/node/5935832732

This changeset removed highway tags
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160731926

Could you confirm whether this is complete as mapped here? osm.org/changeset/160531993

>But why would you repeat etymology data for ever road segment?

It's more accessible for data consumers.

Also to clarify, etymology should be tagged on all the named features where it applies and being tagged on the relation doesn't negate that.
See also osm.wiki/Key:name:etymology

OSMCha works well for visualizing
https://osmcha.org/changesets/160690969

osm.org/changeset/160745951

** https://osmcha.org/changesets/160690552
This is 100% definitively the changeset that introduced it sorry for spam.

* https://osmcha.org/changesets/160736531