Sparks's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
73557987 | almost 6 years ago | I made changes to this building IAW the wiki. |
72970378 | about 6 years ago | Node 876504257 should be undeleted. |
70906530 | about 6 years ago | Sorry, that was some extra tags that accidentally got copy/pasted in. I've removed them. Thanks for catching it! |
70906530 | about 6 years ago | What kind of strange tags are you talking about? |
60880566 | over 6 years ago | Thanks for catching my error. Looks like you've fixed this for me already; thanks! I'm surprised that JOSM's validation engine didn't catch this when I did the upload. As far as voltages are concerned, I have no idea. It's one of those things I hope to understand one day. |
62898687 | almost 7 years ago | Opps, yes it was. So... I reverted that particular change as the wiki says that _link for residential isn't actually available. I wonder if Peartree Road should actually be classified as a residential roadway at all. Thanks for the catch here. |
62898687 | almost 7 years ago | I couldn't find the exact road that was changed to residential_link. Could you point to it, please? |
62898687 | almost 7 years ago | Yes, that's the only time I would have used those tags in the changeset. I'm trying to find that exact change to see the change because, like you said, that is incredibly... odd. :) |
53965286 | over 7 years ago | And... nope, loc_name without name doesn't render. I looked for additional input on the wiki and found directive showing that in lieu of a formal name that a local name should be used as name=* so I have reverted that change. All should be back to the way it was. Sorry about the mix up. |
53965286 | over 7 years ago | I'll compromise on this (in lieu of a formal source). I'll revert the change and make those trail names local names (loc_name) so that if an actual name gets used both will be in the data. |
53965286 | over 7 years ago | Can you point me to a definitive source for these trail names (DNR, County of Frederick, City of Frederick, etc)? Every source I can find says that the trails are not named and when I was in the area I found no trail names (although I didn't venture on all of them). |
35004351 | over 8 years ago | Oh, CHENEY Road. Sorry, I was thinking Cheneyville Road. I still can't recall seeing such signage but I will take a look and try to do a Mapillary survey next time I'm up that way. |
35004351 | over 8 years ago | Hmm, I don't recall seeing any signage of that type before. I'm on MD 4 almost weekly and I can try to run a Mapillary survey from the MD 2/4 split up to Dunkirk the next time I'm up that way. |
46206016 | over 8 years ago | Ugh, sorry, apparently that was a bad paste. Hopefully this has been fixed. |
44964878 | over 8 years ago | Yeah, I may have doubled up on that tag by accident. I've been trying to fix the Patuxent River ever since something changed and OSMAND doesn't render the waterway any longer at higher zoom levels. I don't see the problem with the Potomac River which is similarly tagged. |
22793727 | about 9 years ago | Sure, I'll help with the building import of AA. I looked at that data at one point but decided against doing the work. I'm willing to help out, though. |
22793727 | about 9 years ago | Okay, I just expanded the names and changed them from "park" to "nature preserve". |
22793727 | about 9 years ago | Would you like to expand the names go for it (or I can do it). |
22793727 | about 9 years ago | Yes, that makes sense. They were marked as a park since that's what the county considered them to be. Perhaps I can ground-truth them soon. |
22793727 | about 9 years ago | Ugh, it looks like I never finished the paperwork for this import. Here's what I was working on: osm.wiki/User:Sparks/Anne_Arundel_County_MD_Parks_and_Schools_Import |