I would like to add, if a wiki exist, if lot of rules must be respected in OSM, it's because this map is an "OPEN" project and all data can be used and interpreted by many "software" (and users) and if you don't respect the rules (involuntary; I hope so) so your work is useless because it can't "work"!...

Hi again, thanks for your fast answer, I'm not a "teacher" ans as many contributors, I'm just contributors (an huge) and receive no wage for this task... But like I'm a "kind" person (but not always if I must be in front of stupid behaviours...) I would like to say to you, first all ways mustn't have a self intersection and this is the case but it isn't only the only "trouble"... there is a "wiki"... it open for all like this wonderful but so often misunderstanding project named OSM! But you know we living all in dangerous world and maybe it's better like this... do you follow me? Have a nice day.

Hi Verdy_p, Proud to be French isn't it? I saw the flag on your picture profile... '-) I understand, but as you can to believe, I haven't yet the time to check all and I do not "politic" so I'm not able to fix anything like this... this is why I have contacted you. Ne le prenez pas mal, vous n'êtes en rien "visé". J'aime la cartographie tout comme vous, mais j'aime le faire bien! Il y a suffisamment: "d'irresponsable"!... Et pas seulement en cartographie "ouverte"...

Hi trial, nice to represent: "Laïta Croisières", but you haven't yet follow the OSM rules... as the result we have a message error on the software for this way: "N°967039901", please check it and correct it asap. Thanks for your understanding. (at the first the way itself mustn't have a self intersection...)

Hi Verdy_p, I try to improve this map (like usually) and to clean up... as you're the owner of this relation: "n°4505476" this one is broken and not really useful any more... (look like an open relation) and this one seem malformed: "n°4505478" but "close" and you're the owner too... so it will be useful to delete all "useless" relation or broken... there is enough mistakes on the map as you know... By advance thanks for your understanding. As we want all this map to be "improved" and fully functional in the "future"... but this "future" isn't so close as the work is so "huge"... But if everyone try to work on it in this "goal" we will be able to go "forward"... By advance thanks for your understanding.

In fact this one "4505478" don't seem to be correct equally I will inform the "owner", but I confirm, It will be useful to delete all broken relations and not useful any more in OSM...

Hi frodrigo, I contact you because you're the owner of this relation: "n°2501856" in this changeset and this one is "broken" and useless... and this one is correct and functional: "n°4505478", so as I try to improve this map and to clean up, maybe it will be useful to delete the broken relation for to go forward and to see this map more "functional" with less "mistakes". By advance, thanks for your understanding.

Hi NicolasDumoulin, In this changeset you have two relations "broken", this one: "252312" and this one: "7252313" and both are very wide for to be used as a "polling station relation", moreover it's just "proposed" at this time... like you're the owner of those "relations", can you correct it or delete it for to avoid other "mistakes"? By advance thanks for your understanding... It's time to "improve this map" and go "Forward"...

I know what I'm doing "perfectly"... thanks.

Hi biologeek, are you sure this way N°126025975 (a building) it's Gdf Suez? We have a not in osm for to indicate this is Enedis... can you check it (time date August 28 2019)? By advance thanks. And close the note after.

Sorry for "you" but your Mapper since: February 11, 2012... And it's appear at the beginning you haven't yet follow the "wiki"... even now, you make too much "mistakes"... However, like "everything", when you start something, you must "learn" before! It take time, map slowly, learn and month after month, years after years you will be able to be more faster and map "correctly"...

Come back to our "sheep", this map is "incredible" and this area will be improved quickly than never seen before... have a nice "maping party"! '-)

Sorry But I speak "English" (I have my own reasons, lot of...). for the first "round", it's good... the the second "round"... it's an other story when they make the choice in both side: "left & right" without to speak about the "fare right only, to make a team with some "persons"!... But, I have make a choice, not for me, but, for the children!... And in a case or an other, I can tell you, we CAN'T expect lot of, they are all "liars"!...

Hi bullitss, I hope you have had a good week-end & you have make your "citizen right too"... '-)! For me all have been done! At the poll like on the map! And for the last one you can see the result (zoom and refresh the web page), but I haven't finished to improve this area, but all "wrong wall" have been deleted!...

Thanks for your faster answer I will do that QUICKLY and you will see in days to come the result on this City and around...

Hi bullitss, Why did you have drawn lot of wall "everywhere"???! Did you see any wall on the imagery?? The answer in the most of cases is "NO"! it's just cadastre borders!... It's not wall the most of time. Please take this information "seriously" and don't commit this "mistake" any more... Please can you delete it or I can do that "quickly"?

Hi Truchin, Nice comment on your changeset: "Suppression landuse commercial conformément au wiki". However, it's just because I FOLLOW the wiki than I had used this: "landuse=commercial" on the way "21999647" and my own comment inside this way: "landuse commercial: "to mark areas of land used for commercial purposes. Commercial landuse mainly deals with services and trade (tertiary sector)", entertainment is included" and it was not less not more extracted of the OpenStreetmap WIKI itself!.. So enjoy yourself by making less "mistakes" on this awesome Map who can't really be "functional" and correctly interpreted by lot of software in lot of "area", countries... due to the lack of "skills" of too many "contributors"... have a nice day.

Hi MaxRey_6429,

Can you explain to us on the Node: 8622870116 why you have write this: "disparu le 19 août 1944 à Pau (Basses-Pyrénées, Pyrénées-Atlantiques);professeur de philosophie;résistant dans les Basses-Pyrénées. Henri Edelsbourg, né en Pologne, était marié et père d’un enfant. Professeur de philosophie, il fut l’instigateur de l"???? I believe, it's a "mistake" so please indicate the "right direction" '-) on the "camera"...

Hi, one more time, zabounette, you have represented a camp site on the node n°: "8762613471", that good, however this camp site is already represented on an area; and this node must be "deleted", thanks for your understanding

Hi zabounette, what is it this node named: "Le gros rocher 1250m"???