I think that 'Noudejans' means/meant 'Van Praetlaan' -> https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/BtCBEf0gl2U4SGvZ53o7wg
(if you're coming from Koninklijk Parklaan the cycle path suddenly 'disapears')

you're right!
I was a bit too forward ... :-)
In the future I will put a comment/reminder if I am not 100% sure ...

hello 'Noudejans',
you can use this one as an example:
osm.org/way/255736472
so these are the actions:
- delete these tags:
access=no and motor_vehicle=yes
- add these tags: bicycle=use_sidepath and foot=use_sidepath

hello,
the roads that "Noudejans" has tagged with access=no is indeed not correct.
I would add bicycle=use_sidepath and then it should be ok.
@Noudejans: can you make this adjusment? Thank you in advance.

confirmed by a local from the cyclist's federation.
I still will ask if the road signs have been removed or not yet ...
I honestly think that removing them will still take some time, but in the meantime they can 'cover' them ... :-)
by the way, coming from Vanderkindere there's no C43-sign, but a F4b-sign (end of Zone 30)

https://www.dhnet.be/regions/bruxelles/bruxelles-mobilite/forest-apres-l-accident-mortel-d-iwona-l-avenue-albert-va-passer-en-zone-30-6041df0dd8ad5809d0a48d54?fbclid=IwAR2-Thxk2RmOgOAuTyB60nq38tDXcImLJ7zLackw_ZOG-0oL8cSxSnwcX_c

honestly, I don't remember anymore. I will ask a local and come back to you.

Dag Tonny,
Een aandachtspunt voor in de toekomst: fijn dat ge afgescheiden fietspaden apart intekent!
Niet vergeten om in dat geval dan ook de "fietstags" op de rijweg zelf te verwijderen. Ondertussen heb ik zelf de nodige wijzigingen gedaan.
Hartelijke groet!

ok thx for the info.
I talked some weeks ago to the mobility service of Anderlecht in response to a road closure where we received some complaints from cyclists.
I asked them to add comments when roads would be closed for longer time or for other modifications in road network. I'm not sure if it's them, but I will send them an email to be sure ... :-)

hello bxl-forever,
this is a new user that I apparently convinced to make an account :-)
can you tell me what was wrong with the changeset? I'm asking because I see that you reverted it.
thank you in advance!

Thanks for your remark.
2 things:
1) it's not a footway&buidling_passage but a highway=corridor and indoor=yes. osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcorridor -> I did the necessary changes
2) I added them because these "corridors" are all free of charge. I was there yesterday for the first time ... :-)

you mean on the main osm-layer?
you can also use cycle map-layer or transport map - layer to have it rendered differently

hello VéloJesse,

I just relied on the wiki to transform the highways into pedestrian. Look at the 5th picture in the wiki: osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian
and these are some pictures of some transformed highways:
1) https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/zj62eidr0VBxMZozj7Y1eg
2) https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/_x-xXEa5NPTS7GX1Kj8DRg
3) https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/QUO6Axchv7ZUaFVMPm4bhQ

In contrast to this, this highway remained a footway: osm.org/way/520970583 https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/VqJrGIa0h2kMJNrCmG0NpA

I hope this is an answer to your question, and if not, please tell me something more about your concerns. I like to discuss! :-)

hello @TheExplorator, you didn't answer to my comment and didn't change what I requested, so I will change the amenity of this place back to restaurant. Please read the wiki: osm.wiki/Tag:amenity=restaurant?uselang=en-GB

thx for the comment. I didn't know that a highway in construction could still be routable. I removed therefore the tags bike and foot, and I will add them again when this and the other nearby tunnels will be ready

ok, mijn geheugen laat me ook soms in de steek :-)
mag ik in dat geval vragen om het dan terug te veranderen naar playground? lijkt me coherenter te zijn en in lijn te liggen met alle andere terreinen die wel als playground zijn aangeduid.
En het staat ook als "speelterrein" aangeduid op de website van de stad.
PS: trouwens leuk dat ze daar ook linken naar OSM :-)

hallo, vraagje uit nieuwsgierigheid: waarom hebt ge dit wijkspeelpleintje van "leisure=playground" veranderd naar "landuse=recreation_ground"? Dank voor het antwoord.

Dag JanFi, bedankt voor uw bericht, ik heb de nodige aanpassingen gedaan:
osm.org/way/558768856

Pieter, wie of wat is "OP"? :-)

ok merci. Heel de westkant van't kanaal moogt ge inderdaad (op de jaagpaden) met de SP NIET in, de oostkant uiteraard wel ... er valt daar anders niet te veel te zoeken ze, buiten een hele hoop ergerlijke kasseien en de andere stukken met veeel modder ... :-(