Dit pad heb ik als "disused:highway=path' gemapt: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1280654715955992
Is dit pad langs de andere kant wel toegankelijk?

Dag Tom,
Ik heb gisteren foto's genomen van een aantal voetwegen tussen de Spaanse Lindebaan en het Tangebeekbos.
De voetweg 90 tussen het Fluxysstation en de Drijfstraat heb ik niet gevonden -> https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1407739476619997
Is dit een bestaand pad? Heeft u er zelf al over gewandeld/gereden?
Dank voor het antwoord.

works are still going on at the roundabout ...
I am uploading right now pictures to mapillary that I made today ...

Hello!
Thanks for adding this dropzone.
For your info: the image link (created via StreetComplete) won't be valid anymore after some days ...

is het Minderbroederklooster nog steeds een vaccinatiecentrum?

hello Andy! thanks for your remark! if the geometry of the cycleways is accurate enough, then you can remove the fixme tag, yes!

hello,
this way used to be mapped as a disused:highway=path but you added highway=cycleway. Can you explain why?

This note just has been marked:
osm.org/note/3993334#map=15/50.7789/4.4357
"No cycleway here. Illégal path protected zone and trees placed to block entrance
https://westnordost.de/p/186860.jpg
https://westnordost.de/p/186861.jpg
https://westnordost.de/p/186862.jpg

for your info:
My colleague asked the mobility service of Ganshoren to remove the sign.
Hereunder is their reply:
"Comme nous avons pour l’instant un chantier à cet endroit (construction du pavillon « sport »), l’entrepreneur a placé un panneau pour qu’il n’y ait pas d’accident avec les ouvriers qui vont et viennent sur le chantier. Cette signalisation sera bien entendu enlevée lorsque les travaux seront achevés (printemps 2024)."

@Bear-in-a-box:
for your info: your changeset is reverted in the meantime osm.org/way/1087170589/history

Dag Ruben, heb gisteren nog een paar gedeelten zelf kunnen checken + ook navraag gedaan bij iemand die erbij was op de opening. Het volledige traject is tussen Herentals en Balen volledig bewegwijzerd, dus uw changeset van in september heb ik terug hersteld! :-) In ieder geval, bedankt om het mee op te volgen!

I also spotted the traffic sign where cyclists are asked to dismount. However, this traffic sign has no legal basis
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1224416911593199

Hello Bear-in-a-box, can you explain why cycling is forbidden here?

hello Bear-in-a-box, can you clarify why you changed this way into classified? this is how it looks like: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3489690671286443&lat=50.888983&lng=4.414289&z=1.5&focus=photo&x=0.4460606933943388&y=0.6788692396418508&zoom=0

suggestie voor changeset-comment:
"Humbeekbrug is op dinsdag 31/10/2023 heropend. Tags op brugdek en weg hersteld.
osm.org/way/10868946#map=19/50.97833/4.39030
osm.org/way/619825816
Bron: https://www.vlaamsewaterweg.be/nieuws/hefbrug-humbeek-sas-heropent-op-31-oktober"
Indien mogelijk, graag in de toekomst hierop letten. Fijne dag nog!

can you ask your friend to share one picture that shows a signpost?

I added it at the request of a note of mapper osm.org/user/Jhowie_Nitnek.
I asked if the note can be retraced. I will come back to you

1) "Is there a way to communicate with the authorities and convince them that they should take care about signalling?"
-> it's not the role nor the mission of OSM (BE) to convince others or to tell them what to do. We just map what can be verified on the field. This being said, every time we have contact with them, we ask for an update of their signposting plans.
If you want, you can contact them directly:
fietsen@provincieantwerpen.be
fiets@vlaamsbrabant.be

2) F1 south of Mechelen, F20, F23, F200 ... are all cases where (some) signalling should be present and is not.
If their answer is not satisfying, shouldn't we set rules to tag as complete the parts where the directions are obvious because of the layout of the route ?
-> for that the data model on which we agreed, should need to be modified ... you can always propose modifications
osm.wiki/Tag:cycle_network%3DBE-VLG:cycle_highway

As already stated several times, in contrast to the Flemish provinces, the cycle highways on Brussels territory are not yet defined. I tagged the cycle highway 'C203' as disused. Once the cycle highways are validated in Brussels, we can easily add the C203 back.

In contrast to the Flemish provinces, the cycle highways on Brussels territory are not yet defined. I tagged the cycle highway 'C201' as disused. Once the cycle highways are validated in Brussels, we can easily add the C201 back.

bij mijn laatste check up 3 weken geleden, was enkel deel op Geels grondgebied bewegwijzerd. Dus met een simpele revert van deze changeset is de situatie ter plekke juist gemapt ...