OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
122745295 about 3 years ago

Good day. What is your source for the motor vehicle access restriction? This seems quite unlikely for a tertiary road.

121520559 about 3 years ago

We're in touch, thank you for your concerns.

121181470 about 3 years ago

Maayong adlaw Malvin and welcome to OSM!

Thank you very much for improving OSM with your local knowledge.

Please don't be discouraged by that angry mapper who removed all of your edits. I restored your contributions and made some improvements.

Tagging in OSM is very complex and nobody can expect that you know about all these details from the beginning.

It always helps to check how similar already existing objects are tagged. Or if you're uncertain about something you can always try to find new tags in the wiki (osm.wiki/wiki/) or on taginfo (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/).

You could also join the telegram channel of the local community (https://t.me/OSMph). Lots of people will be happy to help you with any questions you have.

A few hints for future edits:
- addr:housenumber is only for housenumbers, for barangays you can simply use addr:barangay
- addr:street is only for street names, if the first part of the address is a sitio/purok/subdivision instead you can use addr:place
- you don't need to add description=functional to all objects, but on the other hand if you want to specify that something is currently not functional I would recommend to have a look at the lifecycle prefix wikipage.

Keep up the great work!

121128665 about 3 years ago

In this changeset a place of worship complete with name, religion, denomination and address was added.

How does a mistaken addr namespace and an unconventional description invalidate this contribution?

121182260 about 3 years ago

It obviously isn't. A much more suitable tag would be addr:barangay.

You as an experienced mapper could have probably found this out in less than a minute of research on google and taginfo.

Pointing out incorrect tagging without providing a better alternative isn't really helpful.

121142308 about 3 years ago

Good day Spaghetti Monster. Your efforts to maintain data consistency are very much appreciated.

This mappers has joined us less than a week ago and clearly he is very eager in contributing his local knowledge by mapping place names, hospitals, government offices, sport venues, churches and many other things. These are all very valuable contributions.

Obviously some of the added geometries, the changeset comments as well as some of the tagging choices leave much room for improvements. But none of this justifies completely reverting almost a hundred changesets within 30 minutes of first contacting the mapper.

Please give local communities a chance to reach out to new mappers to help them learn about all the complexities and intricacies of OSM.

I reverted your reverts and fixed the tagging and geometry issues instead. Maybe you could consider similar actions instead of radical deletions.

120403069 over 3 years ago

I agree that English should not have any default precedence. It is my impression that there is almost always a name that is more predominantly used than the other, but I like the idea to use the language with the most native speakers in a given area for the primary name tag if an object truly has equally common names in several official languages.

120403069 over 3 years ago

Good afternoon Erwin,

The locally spoken languages in Tagakpan are Bisaya and Klata. Anyone conversing in either of them uses the term Barangay Hall. This is also the name that is written on the facade of the building.

Adding additional non-local translations seems fine, but please don't replace the primary name tag.

118775549 over 3 years ago

Currently all HUCs and ICCs with mapped boundaries are tagged as admin_level=6.

But giving this some further considerations I actually think there are many good reasons why it would make sense to tag them as admin_level=4.

R.A. 7160 Section 25 effectively defines HUCs and ICCs as first level subdivisons on equal level with provinces.

118089034 over 3 years ago

Thanks for pointing this out! The commonly stated phrase that only motorways have implied access restrictions really doesn't seem to hold up.

118089034 over 3 years ago

Hey Jherome. Thanks for this massive clean-up.

Just wondering, isn't foot=yes and bicycle=yes the default for anything other than motorways? Adding this tags seems highly redundant, especially for highway segments that already have sidewalk or cycleway tags.

113219698 almost 4 years ago

Hi Abysmallow, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your contributions!

The tag place=town is only used for municipalities, for barangays you can use place=village.

If you'd like to learn more about the basics of tagging you could have a look at this overview of guidelines by the local community:

osm.wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions

Happy mapping =)

113213040 almost 4 years ago

Hi Marliza, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your contributions!

When mapping barangays you can just create a node (like this one: osm.org/node/9215197632) near the center of the barangay.

If you'd like to learn more about the basics of tagging you could have a look at this overview of guidelines by the local community:

osm.wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions

113201330 almost 4 years ago

Good day vulasala, thanks for catching this!

113053603 almost 4 years ago

I'm a bit confused by your suggestion. This is not a singular feature that could be represented by a node.

Piedra Tuff just means tuff stone which describes the unexposed bedrock that makes up this entire peninsula. I'm not aware of any tags to store such information and I also don't think it's within the scope of OSM to map what's below the visible landuse=* or natural=*.

113053603 almost 4 years ago

Not just maybe. This was clearly a description of the underlying bedrock which is tuffaceous indeed (limestone to be more precise).

111742766 almost 4 years ago

Hello Bryan.

If a settlement already has a place node there's no need to add a place tag and the duplicated name to the outline of the settlement. You can just use landuse=residential instead.

Also please have a look at the page about the ford tag on OSM wiki. This tag should only be applied where a road crosses a waterway. Here you added the tag on a 10 km long section of highway.

99575042 almost 4 years ago

Hi thota_shruthi. When modifying street names please make sure to do so along the whole length and not just for a single segment. Thanks and keep up the good work!

105620937 about 4 years ago

Good day. Just curious, what source did you use when adding this oneway restriction?

99893398 about 4 years ago

Good day. What is your source for this name change? KartaView does not have any available imagery in this area.