Good day FluteButte. In accordance with the "One feature, one OSM element principle" it seems to be preferable not to add ford=yes on a node if the tag is already found on the respective way. Otherwise the ford will be rendered twice (see node 8443498680). Also by changing this ford from track to unclassified you removed the important information that this is a natural riverbed and not a road. Adding the tags surface=ground and smoothness=horrible might be an appropriate alternative to tagging it as track.

Good day FluteButte. In accordance with the "One feature, one OSM element principle" it seems to be preferable not to add ford=yes on a node if the tag is already found on the respective way. Otherwise the ford will be rendered twice. Thanks and keep up the good work!

Also I'm curious from where you know the location of all of these points of interests. Are you doing on the ground surveys? Or are you copying from another database?

Good evening Darryl. This gas station already existed. Same with the nearby Varsity Inn. Please be more careful to avoid duplicates like these. And also please read this wiki article about changeset comments: [osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments]

Good day san_deep. Please don't add bridges if they are not very clearly visible on imagery. The bridge that you added here does not exist, there's not even a stream.

Hello Eric. Are all of these really camp sites? Some of them seem to be hundreds of meters away from the nearest trail.

Good day Zaculeu. I upgraded this from residential to unclassified. Please review the local usage of these two classifications. (osm.wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions#Roads). Thank you and keep up the good work!

Changeset mix-up, proper comment is: [Kauswagan, Panabo City] surface updated

+ [Cabanatuan, Nueva Ecija] floating roads reviewed, missing access restrictions fixed #Kaart

Thank you for fixing. Keep up the good work! =)

Hey bambambiram, sometimes the suggested locations of the schools are a bit off. You can always check the address tags to see if the coordinates are near the right barangay or municipality. This one was about 80 km away, but I fixed it already =)

Good day. The store that you added here is in the middle of the road and it lacks proper tagging. It seems like you copied the location and many others from Google Maps. Unfortunately this data is under a license that is not compatible with OSM.

Is all of the data that you added from Google or did you also use other sources?

Good day nandi_ram, please watch out for noexit=yes before adding missing links. (osm.wiki/Key:noexit)

Good evening JPBaje. You're adding a lot of shops and amenities. Did you visit all of them yourself or are you using information from another map or database? If so please mention the source in your changeset comments. Also please have a look at this page: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks for the revert. Tertiary roads transitioning to unclassified are very common, especially in mountainous areas. Usually there is a lot of traffic from villages downwards towards the city, but almost no traffic to the farms further uphill or to villages that are on the other side of steep river valleys.

Good day ruthikdhoni,

Ways 487023332, 666813290, 871160306 and 871160306 are all very rough unpaved road sections that are barely passable by cars. Tertiary really doesn't seem like the right choice.

Way 173057391 on the other side connects the barangay proper of Kilate to the greater network and should therefore be tagged as tertiary according to the Philippines mapping conventions.

Assessing the classification of roads can be difficult from aerial imagery alone. Before up- or downgrading please check way histories to see if existing classifications might have been sourced from on the ground surveys.

Road classifications in open street maps follow clear guidelines that are defined by the community. Please read the osm.wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions before adding or editing roads. Also please use proper changeset comments that describe what edits you made.

May I ask from which sources you added these river and creek names? You only mentioned bing aerial imagery as a source, please always mention all sources when uploading changesets.

Also rivers should have a continuous classification, not alternating like the ones that you added here.

Good day. Based on which source did you add this road construction? I live nearby and I've never seen any signs of it nor have I heard of any plans for such a project.

Hey KohlBaba. They're almost definitely barangays as Malibcong is divided into 12 of those. But I agree with your argument about remoteness. While the road might be of higher importance than the other unclassifieds further east, it would be of lower than average importance for a tertiary. Thanks again and have a nice day!