Скорее всего, эти подъезды добавлены не в режиме подъездов и зданий, а как POI: кнопкой «+» и поиском типа.

Anybody who has tried mapping in Lithuania knows the "Lithuanian mapping community" is one person.

Tomas, isn't it time for you to retire? You're taking the map too close to the heart, and this incident highlights what you've been doing for the past at least 7 years — driving mappers and newcomers away with your harsh words and rigid mapping practices.

removed the russian name, I don't really care

Hi, did you intend to add the price list to the Rail Baltica railway?

Привет! Не помнишь, как ты экоцентр добавил? Очень странно, что там из тегов только name.

Я понимаю ваши чувства и сам бы хотел сделать хоть что-то со своей стороны, чтобы остановить войну. Вандализм в открытом проекте, кажется, не очень этому поможет: ваши правки никто не увидит, кроме опытных участников, у которых немного другие критерии «реальности и правды».

Очень плохой ход. Если вы опустились до обзываний, значит, другие аргументы закончились. Не ожидал, что аргументы могут закончиться у жителя Украины.

Thanks for opening the road!

Thanks for double-checking! If you notice the rendering gone wrong, please write, and we'll find a solution.

Also I would understand building:part=no, but I did not remove such a tag, because it wasn't there.

The building there looks as it should — and why shouldn't it? I simply fixed tags to be in line with the osm.wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings schema. There were errors leading to incorrect measurements for the entire building.

(ну и это комментарий не к этому ченджсету, потому что он меняет название только у одного объекта — с МАПП на ДАПП).

Я понимаю твою точку зрения. Эти префиксы выглядят странно. Но мы это уже обсуждали, и решили, что так ок. На всех знаках (которые я видел на западе страны) префиксы присутствуют. В официальных документах тоже.

Wait no. These are road numbers? With type marking a block

These are obviously house numbers.

Hi Alearori,

Thank you for updating the map. Please be careful not to delete data you don't see a use for — like these address nodes you removed a few days ago:

osm.org/node/2723866676/history
osm.org/node/2723858410/history

I have restored them, but I'd prefer not to follow each deletion in NYC.

Ilya

Hi,

Yeah, I might be wrong to do that. The thing is, half of the roads had been already marked with "access=destination". It should be one way or another: mixing the two produces weird routing results. I am okay if you mark closed roads as private.

Hi Daniel,

You have closed in this changeset a link for South Conduit Avenue. This one: osm.org/way/46891815

It was reported on our (I work at Juno Lab) map validation, since many drivers use this link to make a u-turn: yesterday it was ten drivers. On the Esri imagery (which is the most recent one that I use for mapping) you can see a regular car using the link.

I believe that even if a restriction does exist, it isn't guarded that well to stop drivers from using the link. I've removed the tags, and I'd like once again to remind you of a data source to cross-check your highway edits: osm.org/user/Zverik/diary/47986

Thanks for looking after the map,
Ilya

Hi, you have removed a road and a golf course south of Lattingtown. Did you intend to do that?