Discussion continues here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/us-route-relations/122274

Thanks for the hint. I updated the areas accordingly.

osm.wiki/Tag:route%3Dbicycle#Members
as well just "allowing" ways in route-relations and recommends for longer routes osm.wiki/Tag:route%3Dbicycle#Split_routes_into_sections
the usage of superroute to combine the sections.
Read "international" in the context of the rest of the world, where a route of 1000 miles length is usually international.

You don't need superduperroute. superroute contains relations, route contains ways and nodes (aka geometry). It's not about hierarchy of different levels.

Maybe I'm misunderstand osm.wiki/Relation:route#Members

but at least as I read it, a route-relation suppose to contains ways and nodes, only the role "information" is intended for relations.

Do you have a better fit? For me village_green was the best fit.

osm.wiki/Relation:superroute
In my understanding of osm.wiki/Relation:superroute documentation and also osm.wiki/Superrelation for me superroute is a perfect fit for those relations. Also offers an easier QA as well as defined separation between the "sub-routes" and the full route.

Are you sure it's actually a roundabout? Since there are no traffic signs indicating this. There are just yield-signs. So to me it's rather on circular oneway.

Hey, I noticed you changed several tags ramps. As far as I know you can use the ramp until the toll booth with e-bikes, bicycles etc. So they should not be considered as motorway_link. Only after the toll booth, the motorway restrictions apply. Could you please double check on this and adjust your edits?

I added a fixme-tag. On aerial images it looks like a camp_site, though there is nothing found online about it. So I have only added the geometry.

Ich denke nicht, dass ich einen Flussteil von Aubach auf Buchbach geändert hätte. Ich habe lediglich Stellen die keinen Namen hatten (Tunnel,..) den Namen der längeren Flussabschnittes gegeben, wie du an der Historie der Wege in V2 sehen kannst. Da diese Eintragung schon längere Zeit existierten ging ich von deren Richtigkeit aus.

Ich sehe in einer Relation keinen Vorteil, aber wenn dir das wichtig ist, nur zu. Frage mich bei deinem Interesse an dem Gewässer schon, warum du die Eintragungen nixcht schon vor längerem selber vorgenommen hast. Das existiert ja nciht erst seit gestern. ;-)

Are you sure about the tourism=apartment and if so add maybe some more details? They look like normal houses.

Hallo Anette_13, wesentlich für OSM ist weniger, dass was irgendwo in einem Büro am Schreibtisch definiert wurde, sondern wie die Ausschilderung der Radwege VOR ORT tatsächlich ist. Daher klingt es für mich ein wenig befremdlich, dass du in den kommenden Wochen deutschlandweit Änderungen machen willst. Oder planst du die 13 Routen in den kommenden Wochen abzufahren?
Viele Grüße
aighes

Hi, both ways are back. I removed accidentally the highway-tag.

Hallo Flo, stimmt. Danke fürs erinnern. Habe ich behoben.

Hi atiannicelli, hard to say after almost a month, but I'm kinda sure, I was send by maproulette to the roundabout (maybe to the crossing, which have been there before) and modified the area according aerials and existing gps-tracks. After I got aware of there should be a roundabout, I reverted my changes.

Hi there, that way should be just a service way for staff of the service area to get from one site to the other and therefore is not a highway=motorway_link but a highway=service. Do you have a different opinion about it?

Hi, as you may know, things changing quickly in China. So might be a 6year old changeset is not correct anymore. Feel free to update the data.

Thanks for the hint.

Do you think it's usefull to comment a almost 5 years old changeset?