OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
21014566 over 9 years ago

Ну теперь уже, когда katpatuka пофиксил. А не были. Katpatuka был жутко недоволен.

21014566 over 9 years ago

Вообще говоря, делить границу на 107 маленьких частей — не очень хорошая идея. Не стоит так делать впредь.

33440551 over 9 years ago

Hello wonchs91,

I'm not able to find anything in this area on any satellite images or on any other maps. Could you please explain where do the data come from?

Cheers,
Andrew

35151699 over 9 years ago

This doesn't look real; where do the data come from?

34924078 almost 10 years ago

…že sa jednoznačne to dá otagovať.

34924078 almost 10 years ago

Nie je nič neobvyklého, ale neznamená to, že to je potrebné a to má byť. Ako mať nekonzistentné adresy na POI a budovách, tak lepšie ich mať len na budovách, za podmienkou že sa jednoznačne to otagovať.

34924078 almost 10 years ago

Pretože adresu už majú.

34841569 almost 10 years ago

Multiple addresses is one of the use cases for having addresses on POIs, I never argued that.

34841569 almost 10 years ago

If some software can't figure the address from the building the POI is in, it's defective software and it needs to be fixed.

34841569 almost 10 years ago

How does the end user benefit from excessive or wrong data?

34841569 almost 10 years ago

No, it usualy does not apply to the building, as normally there are multiple POIs in the building except when it's a building specifically built for some purpose (in that case it's okay to have POI tags on the whole building).

34841569 almost 10 years ago

Hello,

Thanks for your contribution, but there's no need to add extra duplicate data: the addresses of these places are already on the buildings there in, so adding them to the places themselves increases duplication and adds some confusion if the address information is not exactly the same (as is in your case).

If you want to improve addresses, it's better to unify them and remove from POIs where appropriate, moving them to the buildings instead.

30451655 over 10 years ago

Teh Wow.

28724296 over 10 years ago

Revertol som to.

28724296 over 10 years ago

Takto sa to prosím nerobí. Ak chcete doplniť dáta — v pohode, ale nerozhádzať popri tom existujúce. Kolega-Žilinčan tuším teraz to opraví, ak nie — skúsim ja, ale Vaše dáta žiaľ budú zmazané.

Navrhujem nasledovné: preštudujte si dobré ako sa obyčajne mapuje celkovo v OpenStreetMap a najmä na Slovensku. Ešte odporúčam sa zapojiť do diskusie na <osm_sk@googlegroups.com> alebo <http://groups.google.com/group/osm_sk>.

Ďakujem za pochopenie.

28471641 over 10 years ago

Mergen, I think it's not a good idea to add low-cost flights to OSM, at least not in the specific way you did.

Добавлять лоукостеры в ОСМ — не самая лучшая идея вообще, ну и точно уж не таким способом, как это сделано в этом случае.

28471641 over 10 years ago

Seems like a new branch of Eurotunnel…

28236423 over 10 years ago

Далеко уплыл, однако!

28304543 over 10 years ago

Aha, Markdown tu nefunguje.

28304543 over 10 years ago

Hej, už vidím, asi bazén je tuná, [kde budova chýba](http://i.imgur.com/VUozVoQ.png), ale ten kurt je asi vpravo vedľa.