andrewsh's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
21014566 | over 9 years ago | Ну теперь уже, когда katpatuka пофиксил. А не были. Katpatuka был жутко недоволен. |
21014566 | over 9 years ago | Вообще говоря, делить границу на 107 маленьких частей — не очень хорошая идея. Не стоит так делать впредь. |
33440551 | over 9 years ago | Hello wonchs91, I'm not able to find anything in this area on any satellite images or on any other maps. Could you please explain where do the data come from? Cheers,
|
35151699 | over 9 years ago | This doesn't look real; where do the data come from? |
34924078 | almost 10 years ago | …že sa jednoznačne to dá otagovať. |
34924078 | almost 10 years ago | Nie je nič neobvyklého, ale neznamená to, že to je potrebné a to má byť. Ako mať nekonzistentné adresy na POI a budovách, tak lepšie ich mať len na budovách, za podmienkou že sa jednoznačne to otagovať. |
34924078 | almost 10 years ago | Pretože adresu už majú. |
34841569 | almost 10 years ago | Multiple addresses is one of the use cases for having addresses on POIs, I never argued that. |
34841569 | almost 10 years ago | If some software can't figure the address from the building the POI is in, it's defective software and it needs to be fixed. |
34841569 | almost 10 years ago | How does the end user benefit from excessive or wrong data? |
34841569 | almost 10 years ago | No, it usualy does not apply to the building, as normally there are multiple POIs in the building except when it's a building specifically built for some purpose (in that case it's okay to have POI tags on the whole building). |
34841569 | almost 10 years ago | Hello, Thanks for your contribution, but there's no need to add extra duplicate data: the addresses of these places are already on the buildings there in, so adding them to the places themselves increases duplication and adds some confusion if the address information is not exactly the same (as is in your case). If you want to improve addresses, it's better to unify them and remove from POIs where appropriate, moving them to the buildings instead. |
30451655 | over 10 years ago | Teh Wow. |
28724296 | over 10 years ago | Revertol som to. |
28724296 | over 10 years ago | Takto sa to prosím nerobí. Ak chcete doplniť dáta — v pohode, ale nerozhádzať popri tom existujúce. Kolega-Žilinčan tuším teraz to opraví, ak nie — skúsim ja, ale Vaše dáta žiaľ budú zmazané. Navrhujem nasledovné: preštudujte si dobré ako sa obyčajne mapuje celkovo v OpenStreetMap a najmä na Slovensku. Ešte odporúčam sa zapojiť do diskusie na <osm_sk@googlegroups.com> alebo <http://groups.google.com/group/osm_sk>. Ďakujem za pochopenie. |
28471641 | over 10 years ago | Mergen, I think it's not a good idea to add low-cost flights to OSM, at least not in the specific way you did. Добавлять лоукостеры в ОСМ — не самая лучшая идея вообще, ну и точно уж не таким способом, как это сделано в этом случае. |
28471641 | over 10 years ago | Seems like a new branch of Eurotunnel… |
28236423 | over 10 years ago | Далеко уплыл, однако! |
28304543 | over 10 years ago | Aha, Markdown tu nefunguje. |
28304543 | over 10 years ago | Hej, už vidím, asi bazén je tuná, [kde budova chýba](http://i.imgur.com/VUozVoQ.png), ale ten kurt je asi vpravo vedľa. |